Bug#820220: [Pkg-julia-devel] Bug#820220: Bug#820220: Bug#820220: Bug#820220: julia: FTBFS on armel/armhf

On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 12:02:44PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 9 April 2016 at 00:53, peter green wrote: > > It would be useful if someone can reproduce the issue and get a dissasembly > > of the failure location. > > I hope this is useful. I'll leave my screen session

Bug#820220: [Pkg-julia-devel] Bug#820220: Bug#820220: Bug#820220: Bug#820220: julia: FTBFS on armel/armhf

On 9 April 2016 at 00:53, peter green wrote: > It would be useful if someone can reproduce the issue and get a dissasembly > of the failure location. I hope this is useful. I'll leave my screen session on abel.d.o. open in case I need to fetch more information. [Thread

Bug#820220: [Pkg-julia-devel] Bug#820220: Bug#820220: Bug#820220: Bug#820220: julia: FTBFS on armel/armhf

On 08/04/16 20:55, Graham Inggs wrote: Secondly, it should be possible to reproduce the fault by building in an armhf schroot on abel.d.o, which has the same hardware as the buildds. A temporary solution would be to upload armhf binaries built on asachi.d.o. It would be useful if someone

Bug#820220: [Pkg-julia-devel] Bug#820220: Bug#820220: Bug#820220: Bug#820220: julia: FTBFS on armel/armhf

On 8 April 2016 at 21:16, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Why did you switch to 3.8? The default in unstable is 3.6 and in experimental > is > 3.7. I understood there were severe performance regressions with Julia on LLVM > 3.3 that were only fixed in 3.8. > I'm Cc'ing the