Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

On 23-Apr-2016, Markus Koschany wrote: > Please fix these issues and then I'm going to upload the package. I have addressed all those issues in the updated source package, available now: $ dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-adventure/python-adventure_1.4-1.dsc --

Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

Am 20.04.2016 um 11:00 schrieb Ben Finney: > Ben Finney writes: > >> I will merge the “common” files into the ‘colossal-cave-adventure’ >> binary package. > > This is now done, and the updated source package is available: > > $ dget -x >

Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

Ben Finney writes: > I will merge the “common” files into the ‘colossal-cave-adventure’ > binary package. This is now done, and the updated source package is available: $ dget -x

Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

Markus Koschany writes: > The rationale for providing multiple binary packages is that users > should be able to install a subset of an application and save some > disk space. Another important rationale for splitting common files to a separate binary package, is to avoid

Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

Am 20.04.2016 um 00:53 schrieb Ben Finney: > On 19-Apr-2016, Markus Koschany wrote: >> thanks for your update. There are only a few things left before we can >> upload the package. > > Thank you for working with me on this. > >> My main concern is the adventure-common binary package because I >>

Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

On 19-Apr-2016, Markus Koschany wrote: > thanks for your update. There are only a few things left before we can > upload the package. Thank you for working with me on this. > My main concern is the adventure-common binary package because I > don't believe that shipping advent.dat with an extra

Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP], Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

Hello Ben, thanks for your update. There are only a few things left before we can upload the package. My main concern is the adventure-common binary package because I don't believe that shipping advent.dat with an extra package is very useful at the moment. As a compromise I offer you help in

Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP], Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

Howdy Markus, (Limiting distribution just to the RFS bug report to discuss the sponsorship.) Markus Koschany writes: > Am 18.04.2016 um 02:15 schrieb Ben Finney: > > Those are in end-line comments (“# foo”). My understanding is that > > end-line comments with that syntax are

Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

Am 18.04.2016 um 02:15 schrieb Ben Finney: [...] >> I found the following things with check-all-the-things: >> >> colossal-cave-adventure.desktop: found with desktop-file-validate >> error: value "adventure;advent;colossal;cave;spelunk" for locale string >> list key "Keywords" in group "Desktop

Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

control: owner -1 a...@debian.org Hi Markus! >Yes, I would sponsor the package if we can resolve the remaining issues. (setting you as owner, to avoid double reviews by other potential sponsors) thanks for your work, and sorry for the noise! Gianfranco >> The vim comments at the bottom

Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

Am 18.04.2016 um 02:15 schrieb Ben Finney: > Markus Koschany writes: > >> I had a look at your package and wanted to give you some feedback >> because of the effort you put into packaging this game. > > Thank you! Are you a prospective sponsor of this package? Yes, I would

Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

Ben Finney writes: > Markus Koschany writes: > > > CC-BY-2.0 is not a DFSG-free license, if possible better use > > CC-BY-3.0 or CC-BY-4.0 > > To avoid such problems arising for the derived works, I will set the > license to CC By-4.0 in those

Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

Bas Wijnen writes: > I didn't look at the package, but just a quick note: Thanks. In the case of this package it is unusual; see its PyPI entry at . The game as I have packaged it is a normal command-line program: run the command

Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

Markus Koschany writes: > I had a look at your package and wanted to give you some feedback > because of the effort you put into packaging this game. Thank you! Are you a prospective sponsor of this package? > The vim comments at the bottom are not allowed (syntax-wise) Those

Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

Am 17.04.2016 um 05:58 schrieb Ben Finney: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Howdy, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package ‘python-adventure’. Hi Ben, I had a look at your package and wanted to give you some feedback because of the effort you put into packaging

Bug#821260: RFS: python-adventure/1.4-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Howdy, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ‘python-adventure’. Package name: python-adventure Version : 1.4-1 Upstream Author : Brandon Rhodes * URL :