What is the status of this bug? Also can somebody delete one spam message
above. We should support 0xEF MBR. Also look at the note here about "UEFI
to the MBR handle". What the hell is that?
Hi Steve,
thanks for your reply.
On 20.04.2016 02:23, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> Section 5.2 in UEFI 2.5
> (http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/UEFI%202_5.pdf)
> deals with UEFI and MBR, and specifcally lists supporting an ESP with
> partition type 0xEF.
You are right! The even
Hey Josh,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:33:31PM +0200, josh wrote:
>Hi Steve,
>
>thanks for your reply.
>
>> It depends very much on the machine involved, to be honest - many will
>> boot UEFI from appropriately partitioned MBR-partitioned disks. It
>> depends very much on the firmware of the
Hi Steve,
thanks for your reply.
> It depends very much on the machine involved, to be honest - many will
> boot UEFI from appropriately partitioned MBR-partitioned disks. It
> depends very much on the firmware of the machine here.
hmmm...I didn't wade through the 1000+ page UEFI specs myself,
Control: merge -1 821340
Control: reassign 821340 partman-efi
Control: retitle 821340 partman-efi: add extra warning about preferring GPT for
USE installation
Hi Josh,
I'm merging this with your other bug report - they're clearly the same
issue.
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:37:53PM +0200, josh
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
After installation system was not bootable.
During the installation it said that it had detected that I had UEFI
booted the installation CD and proposed to make an EFI boot partion
which I accepted. However, after installation, Debian wasn't
6 matches
Mail list logo