Bug#822693: stackable wrappers convention proposal

2020-02-29 Thread Patrick Schleizer
Could you please provide feedback for this stackable wrappers proposal? * https://github.com/Whonix/proposals/blob/master/634-stackable-wrappers.txt * https://phabricator.whonix.org/T634 Kind regards, Patrick

Bug#822693:

2016-06-02 Thread Patrick Schleizer
The user amending PATH is not great as this would be ignored by (background) applications running other applications. For example update-flashplugin-nonfree run by postinst would use /usr/bin/gpg rather than /use/local/bin/gpg because it will not have the same PATH setting as the user. Etc. >

Bug#822693: Safe Defaults / Automatic Protection

2016-05-20 Thread Reiner Herrmann
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:59:07AM +0200, Reiner Herrmann wrote: > > Manually running firecfg also does not work for software that has profiles > > but where the package gets installed by the user after firejail was > > installed. I speculate for reasons of cleanness, it does not be create > >

Bug#822693: Safe Defaults / Automatic Protection

2016-05-20 Thread Reiner Herrmann
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:57:32AM +, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote: > While firecfg handles symlinks well and per package hacks to create symlinks > are no longer necessary, it still needs a way to make it seamless and > automatically protect users. There is already precedent in Debian for >

Bug#822693: Safe Defaults / Automatic Protection

2016-05-20 Thread bancfc
I've given this some thought: While firecfg handles symlinks well and per package hacks to create symlinks are no longer necessary, it still needs a way to make it seamless and automatically protect users. There is already precedent in Debian for automatic protection should a security

Bug#822693: (no subject)

2016-05-09 Thread bancfc
Sorry my mailbox was overloaded with backlog. You're right firecfg does everything I hoped for and survives package upgrades :) However Iceweasel did not get symlinked because it was not recognized somehow so I asked netblue about it on Github.

Bug#822693: Feature Request: Automatically starting programs under firejail

2016-04-28 Thread Reiner Herrmann
Hi! Thanks for your suggestion! On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 06:54:07PM +0200, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote: > At the moment there is no way to make all programs start with firejail > automatically. Beginner users can't be expected to start a terminal every > time they want to launch a program. This

Bug#822693: config-package-dev available in stable

2016-04-28 Thread bancfc
Note that config-package-dev is already available in Debian Jessie: https://packages.debian.org/jessie/devel/config-package-dev

Bug#822693: Feature Request: Automatically starting programs under firejail

2016-04-26 Thread bancfc
Package: firejail Version: 0.9.38-1 Severity: wishlist At the moment there is no way to make all programs start with firejail automatically. Beginner users can't be expected to start a terminal every time they want to launch a program. This usability problem can be a hurdle for widespread