On 07/16/16 at 09:46pm, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Where can I see that code? Why can't it use libdrm directly?
> "embedded" is not an explanation.
kmssink in upstream has done that [1] so this action is not required anymore.
Thus I'm closing the bug.
1.
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/g
On 07/16/16 at 09:46pm, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 10:20:12 +0200, Víctor M. Jáquez L. wrote:
>
> > On 07/15/16 at 10:33pm, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 18:46:32 +0200, ydir...@free.fr wrote:
> > >
> > > > In fact, it looks like libkms was built in the
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 10:20:12 +0200, Víctor M. Jáquez L. wrote:
> On 07/15/16 at 10:33pm, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 18:46:32 +0200, ydir...@free.fr wrote:
> >
> > > In fact, it looks like libkms was built in the past, but is explicitely
> > > disabled now. There is pro
On 07/15/16 at 10:33pm, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 18:46:32 +0200, ydir...@free.fr wrote:
>
> > In fact, it looks like libkms was built in the past, but is explicitely
> > disabled now. There is probably a reason for this, but there is no more
> > information than that in the
rg
> Envoyé: Vendredi 15 Juillet 2016 22:33:41
> Objet: Re: Bug#825833: libkms
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 18:46:32 +0200, ydir...@free.fr wrote:
>
> > In fact, it looks like libkms was built in the past, but is
> > explicitely
> > disabled now. There is probably a
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 18:46:32 +0200, ydir...@free.fr wrote:
> In fact, it looks like libkms was built in the past, but is explicitely
> disabled now. There is probably a reason for this, but there is no more
> information than that in the changelog, and no README.Debian.
>
> Could we please h
- Mail original -
> De: "Sven Joachim"
> À: ydir...@free.fr
> Cc: 825...@bugs.debian.org, 825833-submit...@bugs.debian.org
> Envoyé: Mercredi 6 Juillet 2016 19:14:41
> Objet: Re: Bug#825833: libkms
>
> On 2016-07-06 18:46 +0200, ydir...@free.fr wrote
On 2016-07-06 18:46 +0200, ydir...@free.fr wrote:
> In fact, it looks like libkms was built in the past, but is explicitely
> disabled now. There is probably a reason for this, but there is no more
> information than that in the changelog, and no README.Debian.
>
> Could we please have more insig
In fact, it looks like libkms was built in the past, but is explicitely
disabled now. There is probably a reason for this, but there is no more
information than that in the changelog, and no README.Debian.
Could we please have more insight about why this decision was made ?
best regards,
--
Yan
9 matches
Mail list logo
