Bug#826300: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

On 03/09/16 14:15, Graham Inggs wrote: A wild stab in the dark: don't we need to binNMU lazarus before we can build packages with it? I'd say yes, in that build log it looks like it's lazbuild which is crashing. So yes a binnmu of lazarus seems the next step. Then, don't we need to binNMU

Bug#826300: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

Hi Graham, On 03-09-16 15:15, Graham Inggs wrote: > Of course you mean s/doublecmd/ddrescueview/ there. Indeed, duh... > A wild stab in the dark: don't we need to binNMU lazarus before we can > build packages with it? Hmm, forgot about that. You are probably right. > Then, don't we need to

Bug#826300: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

On 3 September 2016 at 13:47, Paul Gevers wrote: > Unfortunately it doesn't seem to solve all issues. At least doublecmd > now only FTBFS on powerpc (yes, fpc installed fine): > > An unhandled exception occurred at $0FE281F0: > EAccessViolation: > $0FE281F0 > $0FE36604 >

Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

Hi Unfortunately it doesn't seem to solve all issues. At least doublecmd now only FTBFS on powerpc (yes, fpc installed fine): An unhandled exception occurred at $0FE281F0: EAccessViolation: $0FE281F0 $0FE36604 $0FDED188 $0FDED25C See

Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

On 03/09/16 03:36, peter green wrote: On 02/09/16 23:05, Abou Al Montacir wrote: Upstream suggests the following patch which may be temporary: diff --git a/rtl/linux/powerpc/cprt0.as b/rtl/linux/powerpc/cprt0.as index e237d8d..a5672e3 100644 --- a/rtl/linux/powerpc/cprt0.as +++

Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

On 02/09/16 23:05, Abou Al Montacir wrote: Upstream suggests the following patch which may be temporary: diff --git a/rtl/linux/powerpc/cprt0.as b/rtl/linux/powerpc/cprt0.as index e237d8d..a5672e3 100644 --- a/rtl/linux/powerpc/cprt0.as +++ b/rtl/linux/powerpc/cprt0.as @@ -88,12 +88,8 @@

Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

Hi All, On Mon, 2016-08-29 at 11:59 +0200, Abou Al Montacir wrote: ... > Please hold on, upstream fond the issue. > The issue is related to longjump in cprt0.as.  > They are going to give us a fix in the next few days. Upstream suggests the following patch which may be temporary:diff --git

Bug#826300: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#826300: Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

Hi All, On Sun, 2016-08-28 at 18:13 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi > > On 25-08-16 21:21, Paul Gevers wrote: > > I have a fpc package > > available on debomatic¹ that only for powerpc goes back to the old > > version of fpcmkcf and I confirm that that works. So I agree with > > Graham, that this

Bug#826300: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

Hi On 25-08-16 21:21, Paul Gevers wrote: > I have a fpc package > available on debomatic¹ that only for powerpc goes back to the old > version of fpcmkcf and I confirm that that works. So I agree with > Graham, that this probably just hides the issue that is to be also found > elsewhere, at least

Bug#826300: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

Hi Paul, >Using buildid for compat level >= 9 >dpkg-gencontrol: warning: Built-Using field of package >lazarus-ide-1.6: unknown substitution variable ${bu:version} >dpkg-gencontrol: warning: can't parse dependency fpc (= ) >dpkg-gencontrol: error: error occurred while parsing Built-Using field:

Bug#826300: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

On 18 August 2016 at 20:50, Paul Gevers wrote: > @Graham, I suggest you also get this done in Ubuntu soon, such that the > next release has the latest fpc from Debian again. Steve Langasek starting working through LP: #1562480 [1] and removing powerpc binaries. He found a

Bug#826300: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

Hi On 25-08-16 09:29, Graham Inggs wrote: > I also understood that many of the executables (if not all?) that were > built with the broken version of fpc would be broken. Well, at least pasdoc isn't broken. I just tried it and it works. > So fpcmkcfg-3.0.0 is just one of many that will crash,

Bug#826300: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

I think Alexander is on to something here: > Look like https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1570055 is the same bug > (or at least related) and the bug is in glibs. > > 1) segfault during program exit in _IO_wsetb after output to stdout > 2) same platform powerpc, same glibs version 2.23 but not

Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

Hi, >Good finding, but I miss the words "on powerpc" ;) . true, obviously only powerpc (partch.debian.org) was tested :) >That file is not extremely big and the change is not incredibly large.>We >should be able to nail this down for the FTBFS. Still, the issue may >be outside this file as

Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

Hi Gianfranco, On 24-08-16 14:38, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Interesting findings: > fpcmkcfg-2.6.4 is *not* failing in neither Jessie, nor Sid. Good finding, but I miss the words "on powerpc" ;) . > for this, I copied the file from 2.6.4 over the one from 3.0.0, and I did a > rebuild. >

Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

control: reopen -1 ok, after digging into the issue I did: create a jessie-backport chroot for building create a sid chroot for testing fpcmkcfg- binaries (it crashes just by running the tool with no parameters). Interesting findings: fpcmkcfg-2.6.4 is *not* failing in neither Jessie, nor Sid.

Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

On 23/08/16 19:28, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi Peter, On 23-08-16 04:52, peter green wrote: I tried building the new package in a jessie chroot (which worked with a few minor packaging tweaks), then running the results in a sid chroot (unfortunatley I was doing this on a porterbox so I couldn't

Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

Hi Peter, On 23-08-16 04:52, peter green wrote: > I tried building the new package in a jessie chroot (which worked with a > few minor packaging tweaks), then running the results in a sid chroot > (unfortunatley I was doing this on a porterbox so I couldn't install them). That was the same

Bug#826300: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

On 22/08/16 21:01, Paul Gevers wrote: I am including the patch right now in our packaging. I'll upload it to the archive and I'll then continue bootstrapping on powerpc. Give me a couple of days. Feel free to bootstrap powerpc before I do. I tried building the new package in a jessie chroot

Bug#826300: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

Hi, On 22-08-16 17:49, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > It seems that this is now fixed! > >>> Can you please check if r34366 resolves the problem? > >>Sorry, I made a mistake, you need r34368 as well. > > Can anybody test this? I am including the patch right now in our packaging. I'll upload it to

Bug#826300: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

Dear All, It seems that this is now fixed! >Am 22.08.2016 um 12:22 schrieb Florian Klämpfl: >>> Am 22.08.2016 um 10:10 schrieb Florian Klämpfl: >>> Thanks for the reminder, I got stuck with the QEMU setup, but I have >>> finally a running one as well as a fix. If make all works, I will commit it

Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

Hi, >@Graham, I suggest you also get this done in Ubuntu soon, such that the >next release has the latest fpc from Debian again. I reused the same bug as before: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fpc/+bug/1595485G.

Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

Hi all, On 12-08-16 22:51, Paul Gevers wrote: > If no solution to this issue is created soon, I think it is best to > acknowledge that we (all involved) can't practically fix the issue > (caused by lack of skills and/or time) and we'll need request removal of > the whole fpc stack in sid and

Bug#826300: Share knowledge on fpc and powerpc issue

Hi Adam, During Debconf you found out what the issue was with fpc on powerpc (glibc update related). We haven't seen a solution yet (I expect you are too busy), but could you at least share your current knowledge such that others could investigate further and e.g. check that upstream doesn't