Bug#834744: xmlgraphics-commons: FTBFS (missing build-depends on gnupg)

2016-09-07 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
severity 834744 serious thanks On 07/09/16 at 14:17 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > I suggest to raise the severity now Yes. Lucas

Bug#834744: xmlgraphics-commons: FTBFS (missing build-depends on gnupg)

2016-09-07 Thread Santiago Vila
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 02:05:45PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > I have just filed > > http://bugs.debian.org/836940 > > against cowbuilder and sbuild and asked both maintainers for a > clarification. Apparently apt moved the dependency on gnupg from Depends > to Recommends in version 1.3~exp1

Bug#834744: xmlgraphics-commons: FTBFS (missing build-depends on gnupg)

2016-09-07 Thread Markus Koschany
On 07.09.2016 13:06, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Wed, 7 Sep 2016, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > >> I haven't been able to reproduce this issue either with a clean pbuilder >> environment. For some reason gnupg was installed by default in the >> environment, but maybe this changed recently? > > I don't

Bug#834744: xmlgraphics-commons: FTBFS (missing build-depends on gnupg)

2016-09-07 Thread Santiago Vila
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > I haven't been able to reproduce this issue either with a clean pbuilder > environment. For some reason gnupg was installed by default in the > environment, but maybe this changed recently? I don't know if this changed recently with pbuilder, but

Bug#834744: xmlgraphics-commons: FTBFS (missing build-depends on gnupg)

2016-09-07 Thread Santiago Vila
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 04:47:15AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > I disagree with your bug severity. The build does not fail in a clean > cowbuilder environment. I'm attaching my build log as proof. The build log is just a proof that the build succeeded, but *not* a proof that the environment

Bug#834744: xmlgraphics-commons: FTBFS (missing build-depends on gnupg)

2016-09-07 Thread Santiago Vila
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 04:47:15AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > You should rather work towards defining a common build environment > standard in Debian [...] You must be joking. There is already a "common build environment standard", and it's called the set of build essential packages, of

Bug#834744: xmlgraphics-commons: FTBFS (missing build-depends on gnupg)

2016-09-07 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
I haven't been able to reproduce this issue either with a clean pbuilder environment. For some reason gnupg was installed by default in the environment, but maybe this changed recently? Emmanuel Bourg

Bug#834744: xmlgraphics-commons: FTBFS (missing build-depends on gnupg)

2016-09-06 Thread Markus Koschany
Correct build log attached now. xmlgraphics-commons_2.1-1_amd64.build.gz Description: application/gzip signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#834744: xmlgraphics-commons: FTBFS (missing build-depends on gnupg)

2016-09-06 Thread Markus Koschany
Control: severity -1 normal On 07.09.2016 01:25, Santiago Vila wrote: > severity 834744 serious > tags 834744 - unreproducible > thanks > > Sorry, but missing build-dependencies are RC, and they have always been. > > > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Markus Koschany wrote: > >> This package builds fine

Bug#834744: xmlgraphics-commons: FTBFS (missing build-depends on gnupg)

2016-09-06 Thread Santiago Vila
severity 834744 serious tags 834744 - unreproducible thanks Sorry, but missing build-dependencies are RC, and they have always been. On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Markus Koschany wrote: > This package builds fine in a clean cowbuilder chroot environment No, it does not. If the chroot environment

Bug#834744: xmlgraphics-commons: FTBFS (missing build-depends on gnupg)

2016-08-22 Thread Markus Koschany
Control: tags -1 unreproducible Control: severity -1 normal On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:22:57 + Santiago Vila wrote: > Package: src:xmlgraphics-commons > Version: 2.1-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > > Dear maintainer: > > I tried to build this package with

Bug#834744: xmlgraphics-commons: FTBFS (missing build-depends on gnupg)

2016-08-18 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: src:xmlgraphics-commons Version: 2.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed: