Hi!
This is starting to be a question on how to to things and not a bugreport. I
still cannot understand what you really are trying to do, for interfaces
with a name you want you should look at iproute's doc, the ip command can
give you aliases with any name you want, for info on how to do this
Well I am sorry for disrupting your day here. There appear to be more
issues as you may have indicated.
If the original eth0 is brought up first, and then the bridge (say,
eth1) (or br1) is brought up second there are no issues really to begin
with.
However if the eth0 is then brought down,
Santiago Garcia Mantinan schreef op 04-09-2016 1:15:
If you only have one network card I don't see why you should use a
bridge at
all, having two addresses on a network card either using card aliases
(eth0:X) or several IPs on the same card using ip commands on a up
statement
is ok, but that
> So what if I want two separate "devices" with two separate IP addresses? I
> don't want all addresses on that bridge.
Sorry, I don't understand, what do you mean by separate?
Typically if you are using a bridge it is because you want to link together
several network segments on different cards
Santiago Garcia Mantinan schreef op 27-08-2016 12:02:
On Aug 25 2016, Dryden Personalis wrote:
iface eth0 inet dhcp
iface eth0:1 inet manual
There is a problem here, these two lines shouldn't exist at all.
iface br1 inet static
bridge_ports eth0:1
bridge_fd 0
address
netmask
On Aug 25 2016, Dryden Personalis wrote:
> iface eth0 inet dhcp
> iface eth0:1 inet manual
There is a problem here, these two lines shouldn't exist at all.
> iface br1 inet static
> bridge_ports eth0:1
> bridge_fd 0
> address
> netmask 255.255.255.0
Because you are using at br1 an
Package: bridge-utils
Version: 1.5-9
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
As I was strolling through the nightmares of the Debian and/or real world
Well.
When you set up a bridge (as far as I can tell, any) based on an existing
interface (such as eth0) and then run a firewall that will
7 matches
Mail list logo
