control: tags -1 +patch
Am Montag, den 05.09.2016, 21:11 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
> Indeed, sorry. To summarize, I think by now this bug is about (1)
> extending the description of the libreoffice meta-package to mention
> that additional packages are installed in order to match an
Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> liberation for the former. Maybe this is also something that should be
> brought to consideration upstream.
Looks like this has already been brought up a year ago, but probably been
addressed to the wrong list:
Am Montag, den 05.09.2016, 16:28 +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> [ becomes *a bit* offtopic regarding your bug, but... ]
Indeed, sorry. To summarize, I think by now this bug is about (1)
extending the description of the libreoffice meta-package to mention
that additional packages are installed in
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 04:28:53PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> libobasis5.2-extension-beanshell-script-provider_5.2.0.4-4_amd64.deb
> libobasis5.2-extension-javascript-script-provider_5.2.0.4-4_amd64.deb
> libobasis5.2-extension-mediawiki-publisher_5.2.0.4-4_amd64.deb
>
[ becomes *a bit* offtopic regarding your bug, but... ]
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 12:31:10PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> fonts-crosextra-* fonts, maybe it is a good idea to add fonts-croscore as
> an alternative to the fonts-liberation dependency, so the substitution
> fonts' appearances
Hi again,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> "This metapackage installs all components of libreoffice"
this is exactly where the package description is misleading: It does not
only install "all components of libreoffice" but also additional packages
in order to match an upstream install as closely as
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 08:51:06PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 03.09.2016, 10:35 +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> > This is a metapackage and is supposed to install (mostly)
> > everything an upstream install would also install.
>
> Ah, thanks, this explains a lot! Maybe
Hi Rene,
Am Samstag, den 03.09.2016, 10:35 +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> This is a metapackage and is supposed to install (mostly)
> everything an upstream install would also install.
Ah, thanks, this explains a lot! Maybe it is a good idea to include
this very sentence in the package
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 09:39:14PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> currently, the libreoffice meta-package pulls in both
> fonts-sil-gentium-basic and fonts-dejavu packages by hard
> dependencies. I mean, sure libreoffice needs some fonts to work
> properly, but (1) why does it need two font
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:5.2.0-1
Severity: minor
Hi there,
currently, the libreoffice meta-package pulls in both
fonts-sil-gentium-basic and fonts-dejavu packages by hard
dependencies. I mean, sure libreoffice needs some fonts to work
properly, but (1) why does it need two font families
10 matches
Mail list logo
