Bug#836536: ruby-concurrent: FTBFS too much often (failed examples)

2016-12-08 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, 12 Sep 2016, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:12:26AM +0530, Balasankar C wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 21:49:13 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila > > wrote: > > > BTW: I think the "Randomized with seed xxx" above is a bad idea. > > > Maintainers often

Bug#836536: ruby-concurrent: FTBFS too much often (failed examples)

2016-09-12 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:12:26AM +0530, Balasankar C wrote: > On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 21:49:13 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila > wrote: > > BTW: I think the "Randomized with seed xxx" above is a bad idea. > > Maintainers often ask bug reporters for "a way to reproduce the error". > >

Bug#836536: ruby-concurrent: FTBFS too much often (failed examples)

2016-09-11 Thread Balasankar C
On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 21:49:13 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila wrote: > BTW: I think the "Randomized with seed xxx" above is a bad idea. > Maintainers often ask bug reporters for "a way to reproduce the error". > But if the build is based on random variables, this becomes an >

Bug#836536: ruby-concurrent: FTBFS too much often (failed examples)

2016-09-03 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: src:ruby-concurrent Version: 1.0.0-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed: