Hi Adam,
>Actually, if you've read responses to this bug report:
I read them, but the title for the RFS was wrong, we were talking about
unstable.
The RFS is targeting testing, that is impossible because that version is not
even in unstable.
look at the mentors package
Version:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:03:53AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 pending
> control: severity 836778 serious
> Justification: I think data losses are considered serious RC bug in Debian
Actually, if you've read responses to this bug report:
> >> > I
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 pending
control: severity 836778 serious
Justification: I think data losses are considered serious RC bug in Debian
Hi,
>Il Giovedì 8 Settembre 2016 7:21, Nicholas D Steeves ha
>scritto:
>On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:11:31AM +0200, Adam
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:11:31AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 12:57:32AM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: grave
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for an urgent NMU of "btrfs-progs". Upstream
> > has marked this as an
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 12:57:32AM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: grave
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for an urgent NMU of "btrfs-progs". Upstream
> has marked this as an "urgent fix" <
>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: grave
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for an urgent NMU of "btrfs-progs". Upstream has
marked this as an "urgent fix" <
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Changelog#btrfs-progs-4.7.2_.28Sep_2016.29
>
Sept 5th I filed bug #836778
6 matches
Mail list logo