Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

2017-01-02 Thread Jan Wedekind
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: Uploaded, thanks! -- WBR, wRAR Thanks for reviewing the aiscm package. Your comments have helped improve the package a lot. Regards Jan

Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

2017-01-02 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Uploaded, thanks! -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

2017-01-01 Thread Jan Wedekind
On Sun, 1 Jan 2017, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: You have override_dh_makeshlibs: # NOOP to prevent debuild from invoking ldconfig Debuild doesn't invoke ldconfig. If it's done to avoid adding an ldconfig trigger you should explain that and explain why it is added because it's not clear why

Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

2017-01-01 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
You have override_dh_makeshlibs: # NOOP to prevent debuild from invoking ldconfig Debuild doesn't invoke ldconfig. If it's done to avoid adding an ldconfig trigger you should explain that and explain why it is added because it's not clear why do you need manual actions here. -- WBR, wRAR

Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

2016-12-22 Thread Jan Wedekind
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:32:20PM +, Jan Wedekind wrote: There is one final unresolved issue: "hardening-no-fortify-functions" (certainty: wild-guess) even though GCC is now run with hardening options. Can I leave it as it is, do I need to

Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

2016-12-22 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:32:20PM +, Jan Wedekind wrote: > There is one final unresolved issue: "hardening-no-fortify-functions" > (certainty: wild-guess) even though GCC is now run with hardening options. > Can I leave it as it is, do I need to override the lintian warning, or do I > need to

Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

2016-12-22 Thread Jan Wedekind
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: You shouldn't put upstream changes into d/changelog. I have removed those by the way. Your package has quite a lot of lintian problems, some of them are even listed on the mentors, page. There is one final unresolved issue:

Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

2016-12-19 Thread Jan Wedekind
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: You shouldn't put upstream changes into d/changelog. Your package has quite a lot of lintian problems, some of them are even listed on the mentors, page. Did you see them? Here is the full list: W: aiscm source: diff-contains-substvars

Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

2016-12-17 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
You shouldn't put upstream changes into d/changelog. Your package has quite a lot of lintian problems, some of them are even listed on the mentors, page. Did you see them? Here is the full list: W: aiscm source: diff-contains-substvars debian/substvars I: aiscm source:

Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

2016-12-16 Thread Jan Wedekind
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:48:32PM +, Jan Wedekind wrote: Other problems: - the package doesn't build in a clean sid chroot: not ok 19 - Check a pixel in the first video frame of the video (ERROR: In procedure #f: Wrong type (expecting

Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

2016-12-14 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:48:32PM +, Jan Wedekind wrote: > > Other problems: > > - the package doesn't build in a clean sid chroot: > > not ok 19 - Check a pixel in the first video frame of the video (ERROR: In > > procedure #f: Wrong type (expecting ffmpeg): #) > > FAIL: test_ffmpeg.scm 19

Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

2016-12-13 Thread Jan Wedekind
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 09:51:36PM +, Jan Wedekind wrote: There is no such package in the archive. Is this a new package? If yes, please follow the procedures outlined at https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers Hi Andrey, Thanks for

Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

2016-12-12 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 09:51:36PM +, Jan Wedekind wrote: > > There is no such package in the archive. Is this a new package? If yes, > > please follow the procedures outlined at > > https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers > > > > Hi Andrey, > Thanks for your email. The version 0.6.2-2

Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

2016-12-12 Thread Jan Wedekind
Lyn/Carly On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 05:29:24PM +0100, Jan Wedekind wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aiscm": * Package name: aiscm Version : 0.6.2-2 Upstream Author

Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

2016-12-12 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 05:29:24PM +0100, Jan Wedekind wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aiscm": > > * Package name: aiscm > Version : 0.6.2-2 > Upstream Author : Jan Wedekind > * URL :

Bug#837167: RFS: aiscm/0.6.2-2

2016-09-09 Thread Jan Wedekind
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aiscm": * Package name: aiscm Version : 0.6.2-2 Upstream Author : Jan Wedekind * URL : http://wedesoft.github.io/aiscm/ * License : GPL-3+