Bug#837199: transition: armadillo
On 13/09/16 20:12, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 09/13/2016 07:51 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 10/09/16 11:35, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> On 09/10/2016 02:11 AM, Kumar Appaiah wrote: armadillo has already been uploaded to unstable. While the reverse dependencies should build with a binNMU, I have not tested them and will test it in the next couple of days. >>> >>> Because gdal needs to be rebuilt for the armadillo transition to unblock >>> the vtk6 rebuild for the openmpi transition, I've also done a round of >>> rebuilds to assess the impact. >>> >>> Fortunately the number of reverse dependencies for armadillo is limited, >>> and all packages rebuilt successfully: >>> >>> gdal (2.1.1+dfsg-4) OK >>> gnss-sdr (0.0.8-1) OK >>> mlpack (2.0.2-1) OK >>> seer (1.1.1-2) OK >>> >>> pktools (2.6.7-2) OK >>> >>> I'd like to have gdal (2.1.1+dfsg-4) migrate to testing to get the two >>> RC bugfixes into stretch, before binNMUs for the armadillo rdeps are >>> scheduled. >> >> I scheduled everything but gdal. Let's see if gdal migrates tonight once >> perl is >> old enough. > > Thanks for waiting with the gdal binNMU, I appreciate that a lot. > > I really hope having perl migrate will be sufficient, the gdal situation > in testing has caused several RC bugs and a thread on -devel :-( It just went in. I have now nmu'ed it for the armadillo transition. Cheers, Emilio
Bug#837199: transition: armadillo
On 09/13/2016 07:51 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 10/09/16 11:35, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 09/10/2016 02:11 AM, Kumar Appaiah wrote: >>> armadillo has already been uploaded to unstable. While the reverse >>> dependencies should build with a binNMU, I have not tested them and >>> will test it in the next couple of days. >> >> Because gdal needs to be rebuilt for the armadillo transition to unblock >> the vtk6 rebuild for the openmpi transition, I've also done a round of >> rebuilds to assess the impact. >> >> Fortunately the number of reverse dependencies for armadillo is limited, >> and all packages rebuilt successfully: >> >> gdal (2.1.1+dfsg-4) OK >> gnss-sdr (0.0.8-1) OK >> mlpack (2.0.2-1) OK >> seer (1.1.1-2) OK >> >> pktools (2.6.7-2) OK >> >> I'd like to have gdal (2.1.1+dfsg-4) migrate to testing to get the two >> RC bugfixes into stretch, before binNMUs for the armadillo rdeps are >> scheduled. > > I scheduled everything but gdal. Let's see if gdal migrates tonight once perl > is > old enough. Thanks for waiting with the gdal binNMU, I appreciate that a lot. I really hope having perl migrate will be sufficient, the gdal situation in testing has caused several RC bugs and a thread on -devel :-( Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Bug#837199: transition: armadillo
On 10/09/16 11:35, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 09/10/2016 02:11 AM, Kumar Appaiah wrote: >> armadillo has already been uploaded to unstable. While the reverse >> dependencies should build with a binNMU, I have not tested them and >> will test it in the next couple of days. > > Because gdal needs to be rebuilt for the armadillo transition to unblock > the vtk6 rebuild for the openmpi transition, I've also done a round of > rebuilds to assess the impact. > > Fortunately the number of reverse dependencies for armadillo is limited, > and all packages rebuilt successfully: > > gdal (2.1.1+dfsg-4) OK > gnss-sdr (0.0.8-1) OK > mlpack (2.0.2-1) OK > seer (1.1.1-2) OK > > pktools (2.6.7-2) OK > > I'd like to have gdal (2.1.1+dfsg-4) migrate to testing to get the two > RC bugfixes into stretch, before binNMUs for the armadillo rdeps are > scheduled. I scheduled everything but gdal. Let's see if gdal migrates tonight once perl is old enough. Emilio
Bug#837199: transition: armadillo
On 09/10/2016 02:11 AM, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > armadillo has already been uploaded to unstable. While the reverse > dependencies should build with a binNMU, I have not tested them and > will test it in the next couple of days. Because gdal needs to be rebuilt for the armadillo transition to unblock the vtk6 rebuild for the openmpi transition, I've also done a round of rebuilds to assess the impact. Fortunately the number of reverse dependencies for armadillo is limited, and all packages rebuilt successfully: gdal (2.1.1+dfsg-4) OK gnss-sdr (0.0.8-1) OK mlpack (2.0.2-1) OK seer (1.1.1-2) OK pktools (2.6.7-2) OK I'd like to have gdal (2.1.1+dfsg-4) migrate to testing to get the two RC bugfixes into stretch, before binNMUs for the armadillo rdeps are scheduled. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Bug#837199: transition: armadillo
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, armadillo has already been uploaded to unstable. While the reverse dependencies should build with a binNMU, I have not tested them and will test it in the next couple of days. Thank you. Kumar Ben file: title = "armadillo"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libarmadillo6" | .depends ~ "libarmadillo7"; is_good = .depends ~ "libarmadillo7"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libarmadillo6"; -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_IN.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IN.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) -- Kumar Appaiah
