Em 30 de set de 2016 12:13 PM, "Sebastiaan Couwenberg"
escreveu:
>
> Why weren't the libsaga-* packages upgraded along with saga? You have
> gotten version 2.3.1+dfsg-2 for all of the saga packages.
It was a simple "apt -t unstable install saga"
I usually trust that all the
On 09/30/2016 05:03 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> About https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838915#25 I saw
> that I had saga at version 2.3.1+dfsg-2 and libsaga-* at version
> 2.3.1+dfsg-1+b1
Why weren't the libsaga-* packages upgraded along with saga? You have
gotten version
Source: saga
Version: 2.3.1+dfsg-2
Severity: normal
Hi!
About https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838915#25 I saw
that I had saga at version 2.3.1+dfsg-2 and libsaga-* at version
2.3.1+dfsg-1+b1
The dependency was properly satisfied when saga was pulled from unstable
(it depends
3 matches
Mail list logo