Bug#839240: saga: Should have a stricter dependency between saga and libsaga

2016-09-30 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Em 30 de set de 2016 12:13 PM, "Sebastiaan Couwenberg" escreveu: > > Why weren't the libsaga-* packages upgraded along with saga? You have > gotten version 2.3.1+dfsg-2 for all of the saga packages. It was a simple "apt -t unstable install saga" I usually trust that all the

Bug#839240: saga: Should have a stricter dependency between saga and libsaga

2016-09-30 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 09/30/2016 05:03 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > About https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838915#25 I saw > that I had saga at version 2.3.1+dfsg-2 and libsaga-* at version > 2.3.1+dfsg-1+b1 Why weren't the libsaga-* packages upgraded along with saga? You have gotten version

Bug#839240: saga: Should have a stricter dependency between saga and libsaga

2016-09-30 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Source: saga Version: 2.3.1+dfsg-2 Severity: normal Hi! About https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838915#25 I saw that I had saga at version 2.3.1+dfsg-2 and libsaga-* at version 2.3.1+dfsg-1+b1 The dependency was properly satisfied when saga was pulled from unstable (it depends