Bug#839580: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#839580: request-tracker4: FTBFS in testing (failed tests)

2016-11-24 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:26:45PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Tue 2016-10-11 23:48:15 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > Those patches are posted here: > > > > https://github.com/bestpractical/gnupg-interface/pull/1 > > > > I'd like to upload them to debian as well, though they are

Bug#839580: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#839580: request-tracker4: FTBFS in testing (failed tests)

2016-10-26 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 22:14:13 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > Attached is a patch series. > > Hi gregor et al, > > Thanks so much for preparing this patch series and tidying up some > non-related issues with the package while I've been unavailable! I > applied your patch series to master

Bug#839580: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#839580: request-tracker4: FTBFS in testing (failed tests)

2016-10-25 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:44:28PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 23:10:30 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > > > Help untangling this mess would be very welcome, as both Dominic and I > > are rather short on time. Tagging and copying possible candidates :) > > Good news: I got the

Bug#839580: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#839580: request-tracker4: FTBFS in testing (failed tests)

2016-10-13 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:48:15PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Does any of you RT hackers know how to run specific tests manually > without needing to re-run the entire ~10 minute suite so i can reduce > the cycle time as i'm debugging this stuff and trying to propose fixes? ./configure