Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi,
2016-10-20 02:51 Axel Beckert:
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
Hi Michael,
Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Is this not happening for you?
>
> Seems not, no. But then again, I'm using aptitude most of the time and
> apt only in a few percent of all cases.
It's safe to
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
Hi Michael,
Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> Is this not happening for you?
> >
> > Seems not, no. But then again, I'm using aptitude most of the time and
> > apt only in a few percent of all cases.
>
> It's safe to assume that you have a /var/lib/aptitude/pkgstates.
> Can
Am 20.10.2016 um 02:21 schrieb Axel Beckert:
> According to your description, I'd expect tons of differences.
>
>> The first time /var/lib/aptitude/pkgstates is created, it inherits the
>> autobit state from the apt db, but after that, any changes apt makes are
>> no longer applied to aptitude.
Hi,
Michael Biebl wrote:
> > I somehow doubt that. As I see it, this either this broke only very
> > recently (after the 0.8.3 upload) or it's only happening under some
> > circumstances.
>
> Just curious, can you reproduce the issue with the steps I outlined?
Haven't tried it yet admittedly.
Am 20.10.2016 um 01:42 schrieb Axel Beckert:
> Hi,
>
> Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Afaics, once /var/lib/aptitude/pkgstates exists, which it will after any
>> non-trivial use of aptitude, the sync between apt and aptitude is
>> completely broken.
>
> I somehow doubt that. As I see it, this either
Am 20.10.2016 um 02:12 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 20.10.2016 um 01:42 schrieb Axel Beckert:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> Afaics, once /var/lib/aptitude/pkgstates exists, which it will after any
>>> non-trivial use of aptitude, the sync between apt and aptitude is
>>> completely broken.
Hi,
Michael Biebl wrote:
> Afaics, once /var/lib/aptitude/pkgstates exists, which it will after any
> non-trivial use of aptitude, the sync between apt and aptitude is
> completely broken.
I somehow doubt that. As I see it, this either this broke only very
recently (after the 0.8.3 upload) or
Am 20.10.2016 um 01:03 schrieb Axel Beckert:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 20.10.2016 um 00:44 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>>> So, the complete steps to reproduce the issue:
>>> - create a fresh chroot via debootstrap
>>> - start aptitude in interactive mode, select a random,
Hi Michael,
Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 20.10.2016 um 00:44 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> > So, the complete steps to reproduce the issue:
> > - create a fresh chroot via debootstrap
> > - start aptitude in interactive mode, select a random, non-related
> > package, say netbase, mark it as
Am 20.10.2016 um 00:44 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> So, the complete steps to reproduce the issue:
> - create a fresh chroot via debootstrap
> - start aptitude in interactive mode, select a random, non-related
> package, say netbase, mark it as auto-installed via "M"
At this point, you should have
Am 20.10.2016 um 00:23 schrieb Axel Beckert:
> I have a slight suspicion that aptitude and apt might refer to
> different architectures of gobject-introspection in this case (in
> which both might be correct, just not displaying the expected or
> multiple packages).
I don't think this is the
Am 20.10.2016 um 00:23 schrieb Axel Beckert:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Michael Biebl wrote earlier:
>> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>> Foreign Architectures: i386
>
> Michael Biebl wrote:
>> As an example, after installing the example deb I attached earlier, it
>> pulls in dependencies like
Hi Michael,
Michael Biebl wrote earlier:
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386
Michael Biebl wrote:
> As an example, after installing the example deb I attached earlier, it
> pulls in dependencies like gobject-introspection.
>
> $ apt-mark showauto | grep
Hi
Am 19.10.2016 um 23:48 schrieb Axel Beckert:
> Michael Biebl wrote:
>> So if I install via apt, the auto state is not properly set for
>> aptitude. I have no idea how apt and aptitude interact and if the
>> autobit is something which is supposed to be shared between both?
>
> It is.
>
>> Do
Hi Michael,
Michael Biebl wrote:
> So if I install via apt, the auto state is not properly set for
> aptitude. I have no idea how apt and aptitude interact and if the
> autobit is something which is supposed to be shared between both?
It is.
> Do they access the same database
Nowadays they do.
15 matches
Mail list logo
