Bug#841923: AW: AW: Bug#841923: libclang-common-3.9-dev: missing multilib binaries

Hi, Looking at gcc-6, this is what the depency looks like there: g++-multilib [amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 mips mips64 mips64el mipsel mipsn32 mipsn32el powerpc ppc64 s390 s390x sparc sparc64 x32] I also found out how to use the libclang_rt.asan-*.so binaries, they are used via the option

Bug#841923: AW: AW: Bug#841923: libclang-common-3.9-dev: missing multilib binaries

I did it and I am rebuilding Le 6 nov. 2016 3:40 PM, "Sylvestre Ledru" a écrit : > I guess limiting the declaration of this package in the build dep should > be enough > > S > > Le 06/11/2016 à 13:34, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit : > >> Looks lile g++-multilib is not available

Bug#841923: AW: AW: Bug#841923: libclang-common-3.9-dev: missing multilib binaries

I guess limiting the declaration of this package in the build dep should be enough S Le 06/11/2016 à 13:34, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit : Looks lile g++-multilib is not available on many archs https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-3.8 could you have a look? Thanks S

Bug#841923: AW: AW: Bug#841923: libclang-common-3.9-dev: missing multilib binaries

Looks lile g++-multilib is not available on many archs https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-3.8 could you have a look? Thanks S Le 01/11/2016 à 21:24, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit : Le 01/11/2016 à 19:56, Norbert Lange a écrit : Hi, we absolutely should do this. I

Bug#841923: AW: AW: Bug#841923: libclang-common-3.9-dev: missing multilib binaries

> I don't think this is reasonable leave it as it. > I would like to see this changes in 3.8 and this will impact too much > Debian. I am not saying to leave it, but to do the bigger change in smaller steps. You seem to miss, that not only the amd64 package will change, but any host architecture

Bug#841923: AW: AW: Bug#841923: libclang-common-3.9-dev: missing multilib binaries

Le 01/11/2016 à 19:56, Norbert Lange a écrit : Hi, we absolutely should do this. I believe we have some communication problems, because I brought this up multiple times. Probably me, sorry :/ I am not sure how to solve it, I can think of multiple ways. But it would help if you just apply this

Bug#841923: AW: AW: Bug#841923: libclang-common-3.9-dev: missing multilib binaries

Hi, we absolutely should do this. I believe we have some communication problems, because I brought this up multiple times. I am not sure how to solve it, I can think of multiple ways. But it would help if you just apply this path as it is, and let it build for the ~10 architectures. Can you do

Bug#841923: AW: AW: Bug#841923: libclang-common-3.9-dev: missing multilib binaries

I wonder if we should not move the new files into a dedicated packages. When installing this package, it is installing new packages (lib32gcc1, lib32stdc++6 and libc6-i386) [1] This would increase the installation size quite consequently for a specific case. What do you think? Thanks S

Bug#841923: AW: AW: Bug#841923: libclang-common-3.9-dev: missing multilib binaries

Hi, first, I think this was an issue on my docker installation, it builds fine without that option natively. so try without this option secondly - yes its discouraged, just as adding libs from different architectures in one archive, lint has some more complaints on the llvm packages. I`d still

Bug#841923: AW: AW: Bug#841923: libclang-common-3.9-dev: missing multilib binaries

Hello, Thanks for your patch. However, I don't really like the --ignore-missing-info option (especially as the doc says "Usage of this option is discouraged") Any other option? Cheers, Sylvesre Le 01/11/2016 à 00:56, Lange Norbert a écrit : Hello, I don`t know if the docker

Bug#841923: AW: AW: Bug#841923: libclang-common-3.9-dev: missing multilib binaries

Hi, I attached a script for an exhaustive run of arguments, with the aim to link all existing libraries from this package once. As you will see, there are alot failure, most of which arent a problem of the packaging. We would need to figure out which features should work. So far this should be: *

Bug#841923: AW: AW: Bug#841923: libclang-common-3.9-dev: missing multilib binaries

Hello Thanks for the patch. How do I test this change from the user perspective? Thanks Sylvestre Le 1 nov. 2016 00:56, "Lange Norbert" a écrit : > Hello, > > I don`t know if the docker installation got messed up (different so > versions than on my native system),

Bug#841923: AW: AW: Bug#841923: libclang-common-3.9-dev: missing multilib binaries

Hello, I don`t know if the docker installation got messed up (different so versions than on my native system), but the dh_shlibdeps step won`t find the correct packages for some 32bit libraries. In case some packages wont build, those errors could be ignored. diff -burN debian.org/control

Bug#841923: AW: AW: Bug#841923: libclang-common-3.9-dev: missing multilib binaries

Hi, patch is attached. I tested a clean docker installation of debian-testing, adding this dependency generates the additional libraries. Having those built once via the debian build machinery should give us an idea which subtypes are supported, and wether it crashes and burns an some systems