On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:21:21 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> I agree we need to stop this version of firmware-nonfree going into
> testing before initramfs-tools is fixed, so I'm assigning this bug
> back.
This keeps #838858 (missing SI/CI smc firmware files) open in testing,
leaving
On Sat, 2016-12-10 at 11:24 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:21:21AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > ...
> > > (2) firmware-misc-nonfree lacks "Breaks: initramfs-tools (<=
> > > 0.125)" which it will need even after #847340 is fixed.
> >
> > I won't add that Breaks line
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:21:21AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>...
> > (2) firmware-misc-nonfree lacks "Breaks: initramfs-tools (<=
> > 0.125)" which it will need even after #847340 is fixed.
>
> I won't add that Breaks line because:
> - Only the combination of the new firmware-misc-nonfree
On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 15:34 +1300, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 08/12/16 15:21, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Doesn't apt-listbugs see bugs that 'affect' a package?
>
> I do not know. Does "affects" provide the version information that
> apt-listbugs needs to filter bugs?
I don't think there's any
On 08/12/16 15:21, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Doesn't apt-listbugs see bugs that 'affect' a package?
I do not know. Does "affects" provide the version information that
apt-listbugs needs to filter bugs?
(2) firmware-misc-nonfree lacks "Breaks: initramfs-tools (<=
0.125)" which it will need even
Control: unmerge -1
Control: reassign -1 firmware-misc-nonfree 20161130-1
On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 14:33 +1300, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Ben,
>
> you reassigned this bug to initramfs-tools and removed the version. As
> detailed in #847343, I wanted to keep this bug on firmware-misc-nonfree
>
Ben,
you reassigned this bug to initramfs-tools and removed the version. As
detailed in #847343, I wanted to keep this bug on firmware-misc-nonfree
because:
(1) it protects apt-listbugs users from upgrading firmware-misc-nonfree
and being hit by #847340, and
(2) firmware-misc-nonfree
Grave severity is not justified because this package works fine if
plymouth is not installed. I have set the severity to serious because
firmware-misc-nonfree does not declare Breaks: initramfs-tools (<=
0.125). I expect that adding this relationship is the cleanest way to
ensure working
8 matches
Mail list logo
