Bug#848890: [Pkg-swan-devel] Bug#848890: Bug#848890: Revisiting "Ubuntu strongSwan changes"

2017-05-04 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 10:45 +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > Hi, > I wanted to ask if you got (or will get soon) time for this again? No idea, don't hold your breath. > > I know that Debian is still about to finish stretch, but if you'd find time > you might upload the next version to experimen

Bug#848890: [Pkg-swan-devel] Bug#848890: Bug#848890: Revisiting "Ubuntu strongSwan changes"

2017-05-04 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Christian Ehrhardt < christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez > wrote: > >> >> In the end, I didn't really have time to work more on this, so I've >> uploaded >> the current situation in order to not miss the fr

Bug#848890: [Pkg-swan-devel] Bug#848890: Bug#848890: Revisiting "Ubuntu strongSwan changes"

2017-01-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > In the end, I didn't really have time to work more on this, so I've > uploaded > the current situation in order to not miss the freezes. It still lacks some > bits but it should reduce the diff a little. > Thanks a lot for your work o

Bug#848890: [Pkg-swan-devel] Bug#848890: Bug#848890: Revisiting "Ubuntu strongSwan changes"

2017-01-16 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 12:14 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > Hi Yves-Alexis, > yeah I expected this to be a more discussion-worth one. > > I contacted a few more people and it turns out that those that "really > really" need > it e.g. for FIPS create an own checksum checker independent of the >