Thanks for providing a clear statement of your position and responding
promptly. That was very helpful.
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes ("Re: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#850657: gnupg: Please
find gpg-agent on PATH"):
> This is clearly not relevant, since we're not talking about maintainer
&g
Hi Ian--
On Wed 2017-01-11 06:56:19 -0500, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes ("Re: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#850657: gnupg: Please
> find gpg-agent on PATH"):
>> On Sun 2017-01-08 17:35:13 -0500, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> > gpg executes /usr/bin/gpg-agen
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes ("Re: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#850657: gnupg: Please
find gpg-agent on PATH"):
> On Sun 2017-01-08 17:35:13 -0500, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > gpg executes /usr/bin/gpg-agent, rather than fetching it from the
> > PATH.
> >
> > This is co
Control: tags 850657 + moreinfo
Control: severity 850657 wishlist
On Sun 2017-01-08 17:35:13 -0500, Ian Jackson wrote:
> gpg executes /usr/bin/gpg-agent, rather than fetching it from the
> PATH.
>
> This is contrary to Debian policy.
Can you point to the specific part of debian policy that this
4 matches
Mail list logo