Bug#850887: [TIMELY for TC members] Interim Ballot Proposal: #850887 binutils mips

2017-01-12 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le mercredi, 11 janvier 2017, 22.38:33 h CET Sam Hartman a écrit : > I heard back from doko today. We can expect a reply tomorrow. We also > talked briefly about the issue. Good. Thanks for this work. > Realistically, i cannot imagine the TC coming to any final decision on > something like

Bug#850887: [TIMELY for TC members] Interim Ballot Proposal: #850887 binutils mips

2017-01-12 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes: Ian> You should explicitly state whether you want this NMU to be Ian> DELAYED. Good point. I think we don't want a delay. Updated the ballot in git.

Bug#850887: [TIMELY for TC members] Interim Ballot Proposal: #850887 binutils mips

2017-01-12 Thread Ian Jackson
Sam Hartman writes ("Bug#850887: [TIMELY for TC members] Interim Ballot Proposal: #850887 binutils mips"): > [stuff] Thanks for pushing this issue, for your IMO correct approach to the process, and for your clear and straightforward

Bug#850887: [TIMELY for TC members] Interim Ballot Proposal: #850887 binutils mips

2017-01-11 Thread Sam Hartman
I heard back from doko today. We can expect a reply tomorrow. We also talked briefly about the issue. Realistically, i cannot imagine the TC coming to any final decision on something like this in under three weeks. That timeline seems fairly aggressive actually. However, I think the TC could