tags 850891 + wontfix
Hi Rémi and Karl,
since the discussion about this possible feature is over I'm tagging
this old bug with wontfix.
Thanks for your contribution
--
Gennaro Oliva
Hi Rémi and Karl,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:23:14PM +, Karl Kornel wrote:
> If I would play devil’s advocate, then I would say this: “An action
> like this seems inappropriate to place into a package that does not
> clearly indicate why it is needed. Instead, you should create a
>
Hi Rémi, (I hope the é comes through the email properly!)
If I would play devil’s advocate, then I would say this: “An action like this
seems inappropriate to place into a package that does not clearly indicate why
it is needed. Instead, you should create a slurm-common package, and have the
Hi Karl,
Le 10/01/2017 à 22:31, Karl Kornel a écrit :
Hello!
I have a second patch, to make another similar change to my first patch.
I noticed that slurmdbd’s preinst script is doing the same user-creation.
Although slurmdbd does not directly relate to slurm-client, both slurm-client
and
Hello!
I have a second patch, to make another similar change to my first patch.
I noticed that slurmdbd’s preinst script is doing the same user-creation.
Although slurmdbd does not directly relate to slurm-client, both slurm-client
and slurmdbd depend directly on the slurm-wlm-basic-plugins
5 matches
Mail list logo
