On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:58:08AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> OK. Would you at least discuss it with upstream?
Done
https://github.com/ekg/freebayes/issues/358
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
On Monday, January 16, 2017 05:37:45 PM Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:44:45AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > I think the package name should indicate the field for which it is
> > > meant (freebayes-genetic-variance),
> >
> > At least its good to know that ftpmaster is
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:44:45AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I think the package name should indicate the field for which it is
> > meant (freebayes-genetic-variance),
>
> At least its good to know that ftpmaster is reading here to not accept
> previously uploaded package wis unchanged
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 05:46:54PM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >> As long as a package search for freebayes returns this in the result
> >set, I don't think it's critical to have the package name match exactly
> >the upstream name.
> >
> >Do you care only about the *package* name or do you
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 09:19:37PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>
> I think the package name should indicate the field for which it is
> meant (freebayes-genetic-variance),
At least its good to know that ftpmaster is reading here to not accept
previously uploaded package wis unchanged name. ;-)
Scott Kitterman dijo [Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 04:34:40PM +]:
> >> "freebayes" seems like a very generic name for something specific to
> >such a
> >> narrow field. Maybe freebayes-genetic-variance or some such instead.
> >
> >I fully agree with your generic name consideration. The software is
On January 15, 2017 12:35:57 PM EST, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Hi Scott,
>
>On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 04:34:40PM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> >I fully agree with your generic name consideration. The software is
>> >well known in this work field anyway so I'm hesitating a bit to
Hi Scott,
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 04:34:40PM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >I fully agree with your generic name consideration. The software is
> >well known in this work field anyway so I'm hesitating a bit to rename
> >it. Would you consider this a strong issue that needs to be discussed
>
On January 15, 2017 7:32:32 AM EST, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Hi Scott,
>
>On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 04:09:01PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>
>> "freebayes" seems like a very generic name for something specific to
>such a
>> narrow field. Maybe freebayes-genetic-variance or
Hi Scott,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 04:09:01PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> "freebayes" seems like a very generic name for something specific to such a
> narrow field. Maybe freebayes-genetic-variance or some such instead.
I fully agree with your generic name consideration. The software
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: freebayes
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Erik Garrison
* URL : https://github.com/ekg/freebayes
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Bayesian
11 matches
Mail list logo