Bug#855121: unblock: btrfs-progs/4.9.1-1

2017-03-31 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
>The largest consequence socially is a bunch of angry users who read > btrfs wiki page which advocates running a matching version of > btrfs-progs for a given kernel version, despite lack of actual hard > coupling. Although Btrfs wiki recommends us to use the latest version, it doesn't prohibits

Bug#855121: unblock: btrfs-progs/4.9.1-1

2017-02-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 26 February 2017 at 17:12, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:31:06AM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> Roses are red, >> Violets are blue, >> This will not rhyme, >> Please unblock package btrfs-progs >> >> This is late; I

Bug#855121: unblock: btrfs-progs/4.9.1-1

2017-02-26 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:31:06AM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > Roses are red, > Violets are blue, > This will not rhyme, > Please unblock package btrfs-progs > > This is late; I am a twat; it is full of bugfixes; and should match > kernel version we are going to