Bug#859238: RFS: microsoft-gsl/0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1

2017-04-08 Thread Коля Гурьев
08.04.2017 18:07, Mattia Rizzolo пишет: Nice, would you also please push upstream and prisitine-tar branches? (you may name upstream and debian branches as you see fit, just be sure HEAD points to the packaging branch and debian/gbp.conf reflects the reality if it's not the default) Done.

Bug#859238: RFS: microsoft-gsl/0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1

2017-04-08 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Control: retitle 859221 ITP: ms-gsl -- Microsoft Guidelines Support Library Control: reitle -1 RFS: ms-gsl/0~git20170403.ebab8ca-1 On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 05:33:35PM +0300, Коля Гурьев wrote: > 04.04.2017 03:22, Mattia Rizzolo пишет: > > As I said privately, I'd enjoy having a git repository for

Bug#859238: RFS: microsoft-gsl/0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1

2017-04-08 Thread Коля Гурьев
04.04.2017 03:22, Mattia Rizzolo пишет: As others said already, 'microsoft' in the package name is a sad situation. Personally, is just a can of worms I do not want to open for so little, so please rename it to something else (I like 'ms-gsl'). I changed package name to ms-gsl as you want

Bug#859238: RFS: microsoft-gsl/0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1

2017-04-04 Thread PICCORO McKAY Lenz
i dont understand why the other package depends on that? of course, if more a more moco-soft related will be packaged, this package good to be includen in distribution, its a common case in all mocosoft related... the main target its to use more and more their "standars", i really hate all

Bug#859238: RFS: microsoft-gsl/0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1

2017-04-03 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Control: owner -1 ! Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 01:07:18AM +0300, Коля Гурьев wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "microsoft-gsl" Hi! > Package name: microsoft-gsl As others said already, 'microsoft' in the package name is a sad situation. Personally,

Bug#859238: RFS: microsoft-gsl/0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1

2017-04-02 Thread Boyuan Yang
I suggest renaming microsoft to ms too. Otherwise this RFS might not be completed due to copyright concerns. It seems that all existing packages use "ms" instead of "microsoft". Nicholas, what do you think? -- Sincerely, Boyuan Yang signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Bug#859238: RFS: microsoft-gsl/0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1

2017-03-31 Thread PICCORO McKAY Lenz
due copyrights, and trademarks, its better do not use the "micosoft" keyword.. the package can be name ms-gsl and produce libmsgsl-dev Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com 2017-03-31 18:07 GMT-04:00 Коля Гурьев : > Package: sponsorship-requests >

Bug#859238: RFS: microsoft-gsl/0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1

2017-03-31 Thread Коля Гурьев
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "microsoft-gsl" Package name: microsoft-gsl Version : 0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1 URL : https://github.com/Microsoft/GSL License : MIT (Expat) Section