Bug#859808: composite: Composite not ready for being qualified package of Debian yet.

2017-04-19 16:37 GMT+02:00 James Cowgill : > On 12/04/17 16:43, James Cowgill wrote: > Hi James, > > Do you still think we should keep composite given what Gabriel has said? > > No reply. Since I now tend to agree with the people who think composite > should be removed,

Bug#859808: composite: Composite not ready for being qualified package of Debian yet.

Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Control: retitle -1 RM: composite -- RoM; dead upstream Control: severity -1 normal Hi, On 12/04/17 16:43, James Cowgill wrote: > Jaromír, > > Do you still think we should keep composite given what Gabriel has said? No reply. Since I now tend to agree with

Bug#859808: composite: Composite not ready for being qualified package of Debian yet.

Jaromír, Do you still think we should keep composite given what Gabriel has said? Should the small number of existing composite users be redirected to hydrogen through a transitional package? Thanks, James On 09/04/17 17:48, diqidoq | MAROQQO wrote: > Hi Gabriel, > > Thanks for taking the

Bug#859808: composite: Composite not ready for being qualified package of Debian yet.

Hi James, On 04/08/2017 04:27 PM, James Cowgill wrote: I don't think I misunderstood, I just don't know much about hydrogen or composite. Obviously the GUIs look almost identical, and I think it would be better to drop composite if users can be switched to hydrogen with no loss in

Bug#859808: composite: Composite not ready for being qualified package of Debian yet.

Hi Gabriel, Thanks for taking the time to chime in here. I really appreciate your open and clear statement about the status of the project. It helps me a lot here, since many seem not to get where I come from with this issue, which, by the way, was a recommendation on IRC #debian-next and not

Bug#859808: composite: Composite not ready for being qualified package of Debian yet.

On 04/08/2017 04:09 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Yes it is statistic Are you joking!!! I am pro_audio user by profession you think that pro_audio users are so silly!!! You can't be serious! I still don't understand what scary you? Having Hydrogen and Composite in archive together is totally

Bug#859808: composite: Composite not ready for being qualified package of Debian yet.

Hi all, I'm the developer of Composite. In my humble opinion, Composite should never have been added to Debian. It was not ready. While it did offer a little bit of useful functionality (the hydrogen drumkits as an LV2 plugin), it overall was the beginnings of a new project, and Debian added it

Bug#859808: composite: Composite not ready for being qualified package of Debian yet.

On 08/04/17 14:01, diqidoq | MAROQQO wrote: > Thanks for your thoughts on this, James, but let me reply on this clearly: > > On 04/08/2017 01:35 PM, James Cowgill wrote: >> If the functionality provided by composite is now in hydrogen or >> elsewhere then maybe composite can be removed on the

Bug#859808: composite: Composite not ready for being qualified package of Debian yet.

2017-04-08 12:49 GMT+02:00 MAROQQO digital media : Hi MAROQQO > On 04/08/2017 08:52 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > >> composite package builds fine and seems to have it's own users ... by >> popcon >> https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=composite >> > > To simply say

Bug#859808: composite: Composite not ready for being qualified package of Debian yet.

Thanks for your thoughts on this, James, but let me reply on this clearly: On 04/08/2017 01:35 PM, James Cowgill wrote: If the functionality provided by composite is now in hydrogen or elsewhere then maybe composite can be removed on the basis that it's obsolete and has little upstream

Bug#859808: composite: Composite not ready for being qualified package of Debian yet.

Hello Jonas, well there is maybe a language barrier causing this? On 04/08/2017 01:26 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Please bring up that question at debian-devel mailinglist - this bugreport is the wrong place for that. That was not another issue report. It was a rhetorical statement to

Bug#859808: composite: Composite not ready for being qualified package of Debian yet.

Hi, if I remember correctly, one of the main goal for the Composite fork of Hydrogen, was to get Hydrogen as a LV2 plug. I just tried it with jalv.select, jalv, jalv.gtk, jalv.gtk3, jalv.gtkmm, and jalv.qt and all of them gaves me : Feature http://lv2plug.in/ns/ext/event is not supported So

Bug#859808: composite: Composite not ready for being qualified package of Debian yet.

Control: severity -1 important [^ Prevent autoremoval while this is disputed] [+CC Gabriel who may be interested] Hi, On 08/04/17 11:49, MAROQQO digital media wrote: > To be honest I really wonder about what qualifies a package to be added > to the repositories of Debian, since I used to tend

Bug#859808: composite: Composite not ready for being qualified package of Debian yet.

Quoting MAROQQO digital media (2017-04-08 12:49:00) > Since I have tested the package I can say that this a 100% copy of an > old Hydrogen version without progression. Quite an interesting claim. > To be honest I really wonder about what qualifies a package to be > added to the repositories

Bug#859808: composite: Composite not ready for being qualified package of Debian yet.

Hi, thanks for your thoughts on this, Jaromir but: On 04/08/2017 08:52 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: composite package builds fine and seems to have it's own users ... by popcon https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=composite To simply say "well, it has its own users" by showing install graphs

Bug#859808: composite: Composite not ready for being qualified package of Debian yet.

2017-04-07 17:00 GMT+02:00 Digidog : > Package: composite > Version: 0.006.2+dfsg0-7 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Dear Maintainer, > > Request > --- > + Please remove the Composite package from the Debian repositories in > near future.

Bug#859808: composite: Composite not ready for being qualified package of Debian yet.

Package: composite Version: 0.006.2+dfsg0-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, Request --- + Please remove the Composite package from the Debian repositories in near future. Reasons --- + Composite describes its own status as "a broken version of