Christian Seiler writes:
> On 05/16/2017 01:28 PM, James Cowgill wrote:
>> +ifneq ($(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU), amd64 i386),)
>
> Also, you should add x32 to the list of archs next to amd64 and
> i386 where SSE3 and higher should be disabled.
AFAICT, amd64 should cover it:
Hi,
a small comment on the patch:
On 05/16/2017 01:28 PM, James Cowgill wrote:
> override_dh_auto_configure:
> - ./autogen.sh
> -ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_ARCH),i386)
> - ./autogen.sh --disable-avx --disable-sse
> - dh_auto_configure -- --disable-avx --disable-sse
> +ifneq ($(filter
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
On 16/05/17 09:50, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:01:53AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
>>
>> Alas, non-x86 builds are still failing, with the immediate cause of
>> failure being either an uncompilable cpuid call
>
> Hmmm, I'm a bit
Hi Aaron,
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:01:53AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
>
> Alas, non-x86 builds are still failing, with the immediate cause of
> failure being either an uncompilable cpuid call
Hmmm, I'm a bit clueless about this.
> or (in the case of
> powerpc[spe] and ppc64[el]) the use of
Andreas Tille writes:
> Thanks, patch updated, pending upload after discussing #861755 with
> upstream.
Alas, non-x86 builds are still failing, with the immediate cause of
failure being either an uncompilable cpuid call or (in the case of
powerpc[spe] and ppc64[el]) the use of
Control: tags -1 pending
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 09:44:46AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Please try moving #include up to before the check for
> HAVE_X86INTRIN_H, which will otherwise still be undefined at that point.
Thanks, patch updated, pending upload after discussing #861755 with
Andreas Tille writes:
> thanks for your portability checks.
No problem. (Hi, Andreas!)
> Any idea what I might have done wrongly?
Please try moving #include up to before the check for
HAVE_X86INTRIN_H, which will otherwise still be undefined at that point.
Thanks!
--
Hi Aaron,
thanks for your portability checks.
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:59:41AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Builds of libpll for non-x86 architectures have been failing:
>
> pll.h:28:23: fatal error: x86intrin.h: No such file or directory
>
> It looks like the build system already checks
Source: libpll
Version: 0.0+20160909+ds1-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Justification: fails to build from source
Builds of libpll for non-x86 architectures have been failing:
pll.h:28:23: fatal error: x86intrin.h: No such file or directory
It looks like the build system already checks
9 matches
Mail list logo