Bug#863802: systemd unit breaks ferm in some setups in jessie->stretch upgrade

2017-06-06 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:08:35PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Someone should decide, which is not me. Therefore I don't think this is > grave. Feel free to downgrade. I've only marked it RC due to possible jessie-> stretch upgrade problems. I'm attaching a service unit which waits for name

Bug#863802: systemd unit breaks ferm in some setups in jessie->stretch upgrade

2017-05-31 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Wed, 31 May 2017, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Package: ferm > Version: 2.3-2 > Severity: grave > > Ferm is broken in stretch for any rule set which contains resolve() > statements. > (There might be others relying on network, didn't check). This got introduced > in 2.3-2, which now uses a

Bug#863802: systemd unit breaks ferm in some setups in jessie->stretch upgrade

2017-05-31 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: ferm Version: 2.3-2 Severity: grave Ferm is broken in stretch for any rule set which contains resolve() statements. (There might be others relying on network, didn't check). This got introduced in 2.3-2, which now uses a Wants:/Before: network-pre.target In jessie, no systemd unit was