On Sat, 2018-05-05 at 09:44 +0900, Masanori Goto wrote:
> Recently I encountered this amd64 kernel issue on my i386 architecture
> machine. I think this is useful to be mentioned. Why don't we want to
> apply this proposed text?
>
> > You're quite right, this should have been documented. It
Masanori Goto wrote:
> Recently I encountered this amd64 kernel issue on my i386 architecture
> machine. I think this is useful to be mentioned. Why don't we want to
> apply this proposed text?
I don't know anything about how widespread or critical or worthy of
documentation this bug might be,
Recently I encountered this amd64 kernel issue on my i386 architecture
machine. I think this is useful to be mentioned. Why don't we want to
apply this proposed text?
> You're quite right, this should have been documented. It might be
> worth mentioning linux-headers-amd64 as well. Also,
Stuart Prescott wrote:
> With Stretch, amd64 flavour kernels are no longer supplied within the i386
> Debian architecture (i.e. for a 64 bit kernel with a 32 bit userspace). The
> release notes should document that these kernel packages are no longer
> offered so that users don't accidentally run
On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 23:37 +1000, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> Package: release-notes
> Severity: important
>
> With Stretch, amd64 flavour kernels are no longer supplied within the i386
> Debian architecture (i.e. for a 64 bit kernel with a 32 bit userspace). The
> release notes should document
Package: release-notes
Severity: important
With Stretch, amd64 flavour kernels are no longer supplied within the i386
Debian architecture (i.e. for a 64 bit kernel with a 32 bit userspace). The
release notes should document that these kernel packages are no longer
offered so that users don't
6 matches
Mail list logo
