Bug#865212: stretch-pu: package qgis/2.14.11+dfsg-3+deb9u1

Control: tag -1 + confirmed pending Sebastiaan Couwenberg (2017-07-02): > qgis (2.14.15+dfsg-2) is now in testing, and unstable has -3: > > qgis | 2.14.15+dfsg-2 | testing | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, > i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x > > qgis |

Bug#865212: stretch-pu: package qgis/2.14.11+dfsg-3+deb9u1

On 06/26/2017 01:37 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Bas Couwenberg (2017-06-26): >> I see no reason to not accept the stretch-pu. >> >> The issue with qgis and osgearth 2.8 / openscenegraph-3.4 only affects >> unstable. > > As I said: version constraints. stable must have a

Bug#865212: stretch-pu: package qgis/2.14.11+dfsg-3+deb9u1

Bas Couwenberg (2017-06-26): > I see no reason to not accept the stretch-pu. > > The issue with qgis and osgearth 2.8 / openscenegraph-3.4 only affects > unstable. As I said: version constraints. stable must have a lower version than the one in unstable. If this upload is

Bug#865212: stretch-pu: package qgis/2.14.11+dfsg-3+deb9u1

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On 2017-06-26 12:38, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Control: tag -1 - confirmed + moreinfo Cyril Brulebois (2017-06-26): Control: tag -1 confirmed … Looks good to me, feel free to upload. On second thought, the situation with openscenegraph [1] is

Bug#865212: stretch-pu: package qgis/2.14.11+dfsg-3+deb9u1

Control: tag -1 - confirmed + moreinfo Cyril Brulebois (2017-06-26): > Control: tag -1 confirmed … > Looks good to me, feel free to upload. On second thought, the situation with openscenegraph [1] is going to lead to version constraint violation on point release day AFAIUI, if

Bug#865212: stretch-pu: package qgis/2.14.11+dfsg-3+deb9u1

Hi Mattia, On 2017-06-26 12:11, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 07:32:35AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Right, I did that initially but dch complained that it wasn't a recognised distribution and the DevRef also doesn't mention the use of codenames. Looks like bugs need to

Bug#865212: stretch-pu: package qgis/2.14.11+dfsg-3+deb9u1

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 07:32:35AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Right, I did that initially but dch complained that it wasn't a > recognised distribution and the DevRef also doesn't mention the use of > codenames. Looks like bugs need to be filed for those two. No need. devref:

Bug#865212: stretch-pu: package qgis/2.14.11+dfsg-3+deb9u1

Control: tag -1 confirmed Sebastiaan Couwenberg (2017-06-26): > Right, I did that initially but dch complained that it wasn't a > recognised distribution and the DevRef also doesn't mention the use of > codenames. Looks like bugs need to be filed for those two. Be my guest.

Bug#865212: stretch-pu: package qgis/2.14.11+dfsg-3+deb9u1

On 06/25/2017 11:03 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Bas Couwenberg (2017-06-19): >> +qgis (2.14.11+dfsg-3+deb9u1) stable; urgency=medium > > Please target stretch if you want to update packages in stretch. Right, I did that initially but dch complained that it wasn't a

Bug#865212: stretch-pu: package qgis/2.14.11+dfsg-3+deb9u1

Hi Bas, Bas Couwenberg (2017-06-19): > As reported in #864695, the qgis packages cause the jessie to stretch > upgrade to fail due to missing Breaks/Replaces for qgis_customwidgets.py > that moved from python-qgis to python-qgis-common. > > The proposed update adds the

Bug#865212: stretch-pu: package qgis/2.14.11+dfsg-3+deb9u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu As reported in #864695, the qgis packages cause the jessie to stretch upgrade to fail due to missing Breaks/Replaces for qgis_customwidgets.py that moved from python-qgis to