On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 8:21 PM Robert James Clay wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 1:58 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>> And I think using upstream http release page is much simpler for you.
> I'm inclined to agree and will look at using that site instead.
In testing with using the
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 1:58 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Not about repack, current watch file will download tarball that github
> generated, not the one upstream uploading to github release. Look at
> https://github.com/ledgersmb/LedgerSMB/releases, please be careful
> that there're two
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:25 AM Robert James Clay wrote:
> Running, for instance, the command "uscan --force-download --verbose --rename
> --destdir .." results in the error "BAD signature". And indeed, checking the
> resulting files from that command finds that the archive does look to have
All,
The upstream for the ledgersmb package [1] moved from Sourceforge to GitHub
including for where new releases of the application are made available; so
the debian/watch file in the package needed to be`updated for the new
locations of the distribution archive and its detached`gpg file that
4 matches
Mail list logo
