Hi Wookey,
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 06:11:04PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> On 2017-09-04 14:09 +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
>
> > Well, technically it might be correct, but I doubt that there is a
> > working pipeline involving tophat, bowtie and friends on non-amd64
> > architectures.
>
> Well. I
On 2017-09-04 14:09 +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> On 09/04/2017 12:00 PM, Wookey wrote:
> > On 2017-09-04 10:06 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >> Hi Edmund,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 07:37:38PM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
> >>> It seems to be possible to build this package on arm6
On 09/04/2017 03:16 PM, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
>> Well, technically it might be correct, but I doubt that there is a
>> working pipeline involving tophat, bowtie and friends on non-amd64
>> architectures.
>
> On the other hand, if you have a heterogeneous cluster then perhaps
> you don't need
> Well, technically it might be correct, but I doubt that there is a
> working pipeline involving tophat, bowtie and friends on non-amd64
> architectures.
On the other hand, if you have a heterogeneous cluster then perhaps
you don't need or want all elements of the pipeline to run on the same
arch
On 09/04/2017 12:00 PM, Wookey wrote:
> On 2017-09-04 10:06 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Hi Edmund,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 07:37:38PM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
>>> It seems to be possible to build this package on arm64.
>>> Is there any reason why it would not work on arm64?
>>
>>
On 2017-09-04 10:06 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Edmund,
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 07:37:38PM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
> > It seems to be possible to build this package on arm64.
> > Is there any reason why it would not work on arm64?
>
> It might be that tophat builds on other ar
> It might be that tophat builds on other architectures but it Depends
> bowtie2 | bowtie and these are only available on the explicitly
> specified architectures.
Bowtie2 is not yet available on arm64, but bowtie is, so a dependency
on "bowtie2 | bowtie" should not be an obstacle.
Hi Edmund,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 07:37:38PM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
> It seems to be possible to build this package on arm64.
> Is there any reason why it would not work on arm64?
It might be that tophat builds on other architectures but it Depends
bowtie2 | bowtie and these are only
Source: tophat
Version: 2.1.1+dfsg-3
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: arm64
It seems to be possible to build this package on arm64.
Is there any reason why it would not work on arm64?
9 matches
Mail list logo
