* Petter Reinholdtsen [2021-10-01 14:31]:
> [Nicolas Schodet]
> > I think there is no need to check, the product ID is included verbatim
> > in the libnxt code source:
> >
> > { 0x03EB, 0x6124 }, /* SAM-BA */
> OK, very good. Btw, when will the NXT go into this mode? Is there a
> point in
[Nicolas Schodet]
> I think there is no need to check, the product ID is included verbatim
> in the libnxt code source:
>
> { 0x03EB, 0x6124 }, /* SAM-BA */
OK, very good. Btw, when will the NXT go into this mode? Is there a
point in listing it as one of the NXT IDs at all?
--
Vennlig
* Petter Reinholdtsen [2021-09-30 10:49]:
> [Nicolas Schodet]
> > I think so, could you check you have the same product id on your NXT?
> I guess, but am not quite sure how to check. Do you have a recipe?
I think there is no need to check, the product ID is included verbatim
in the libnxt code
[Nicolas Schodet]
> I think so, could you check you have the same product id on your NXT?
I guess, but am not quite sure how to check. Do you have a recipe?
>> Alternative, perhaps that USB ID should not be listed in the appstream
>> metainfo file? I suspect I got the ID from one of the udev
* Petter Reinholdtsen [2021-09-29 17:13]:
> [Nicolas Schodet]
> > Actually, the NXT in flash mode is using the Atmel ROM bootloader which
> > uses 0x03eb:0x6124. Every devices using the SAM-BA bootloader on Atmel
> > AT91SAM chips will use this identifiers.
> Right. So perhaps this patch is a
[Nicolas Schodet]
> Actually, the NXT in flash mode is using the Atmel ROM bootloader which
> uses 0x03eb:0x6124. Every devices using the SAM-BA bootloader on Atmel
> AT91SAM chips will use this identifiers.
Right. So perhaps this patch is a better one?
* Petter Reinholdtsen [2021-09-27 10:09]:
> I had a look in /var/lib/usbutils/usb.ids to figure out what the ID is
> registered for. As far as I can tell it is not connected to any
> USB device in the USB ID database. Perhaps it is a good idea to get
> both IDs registered there? The ID in
7 matches
Mail list logo
