Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

Hi, itd writes: > Hi, > > Kai Harries: >> The depender will break if the dependency is not at the path where it >> used to be at build-time (by default /nix/store/...). All software >> deployed by nix contains the full path to its dependencies. And all >> dependencies are available inside the

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

Hi, Kai Harries: > The depender will break if the dependency is not at the path where it > used to be at build-time (by default /nix/store/...). All software > deployed by nix contains the full path to its dependencies. And all > dependencies are available inside the nix-store. The idea is to

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

Dmitry Bogatov writes: > [2018-12-29 19:54] Vincent Bernat >> > Probably not. Violations of FHS is violation of policy, and to get >> > authorization to policy violation is long road, starting with discussion >> > on debian-devel@. >> > >> > But, can't we just configure Nix to store it under

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

[2018-12-29 19:54] Vincent Bernat > > Probably not. Violations of FHS is violation of policy, and to get > > authorization to policy violation is long road, starting with discussion > > on debian-devel@. > > > > But, can't we just configure Nix to store it under /var/nix? > > This would break

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

❦ 29 décembre 2018 18:33 +00, Dmitry Bogatov : > Probably not. Violations of FHS is violation of policy, and to get > authorization to policy violation is long road, starting with discussion > on debian-devel@. > > But, can't we just configure Nix to store it under /var/nix? This would break

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

[2018-12-27 11:24] Kai Harries > > [2018-02-26 22:46] Andrey Rahmatullin > >> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:14:37PM +0100, Kai Harries wrote: > >> > > The source package you've uploaded is broken, as .dsc mentions > >> > > nix_1.11.15-2~a1.debian.tar.xz. > > > > Hi! > > > > What is state of

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

Kai Harries writes: > Dmitry Bogatov writes: > >> [2018-02-26 22:46] Andrey Rahmatullin >>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:14:37PM +0100, Kai Harries wrote: >>> > > The source package you've uploaded is broken, as .dsc mentions >>> > > nix_1.11.15-2~a1.debian.tar.xz. >> >> Hi! >> >> What is state

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

Dmitry Bogatov writes: > [2018-02-26 22:46] Andrey Rahmatullin >> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:14:37PM +0100, Kai Harries wrote: >> > > The source package you've uploaded is broken, as .dsc mentions >> > > nix_1.11.15-2~a1.debian.tar.xz. > > Hi! > > What is state of affairs with packaging nix? I

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

[2018-02-26 22:46] Andrey Rahmatullin > On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:14:37PM +0100, Kai Harries wrote: > > > The source package you've uploaded is broken, as .dsc mentions > > > nix_1.11.15-2~a1.debian.tar.xz. Hi! What is state of affairs with packaging nix? I am interested in getting things

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:14:37PM +0100, Kai Harries wrote: > > The source package you've uploaded is broken, as .dsc mentions > > nix_1.11.15-2~a1.debian.tar.xz. > > My fault, GitHub doesn't like '~' in file names so I have uploaded > the files with an '.' instead of '~'. I have uploaded a new

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

> W: nix: manpage-has-errors-from-man usr/share/man/man1/nix-store.1.gz 1235: > warning [p 13, 9.7i]: can't break line > W: nix: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/nix-generate-patches > > I hope this is acceptable. // I am not DD; did not read source. As far as I know, lintian warnings and

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

Hello, Andrey Rahmatullin writes: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > The source package you've uploaded is broken, as .dsc mentions > nix_1.11.15-2~a1.debian.tar.xz. My fault, GitHub doesn't like '~' in file names so I have uploaded the files with an '.' instead of '~'. I have

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo The source package you've uploaded is broken, as .dsc mentions nix_1.11.15-2~a1.debian.tar.xz. I don't think the package is even buildable tbh, looking at debian/nix-docs.docs. The version, 1.11.15-2~a1, is wrong for an initial Debian upload. Also, the version in the

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nix": * Package name: nix Version : 1.1.15 Upstream Author : Eelco Dolstra * URL : https://nixos.org/nix/ * License : LGPL v2.1 Section : devel