Hi, Ben.
On Oct 12 2017, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 18:09 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > Yes, I think that the problem is that the programs are getting bigger and
> > bigger. Would setting vm.min_free_kbytes to a higher value worth it?
>
> It might help, depending on how
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 18:09 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Hi, Ben.
>
> On Oct 11 2017, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 11:48 -0300, rbr...@ime.usp.br wrote:
> > > I am using an armel system with only 128MB of RAM (a KuroBox Pro) running
> > > Debian
Hi, Ben.
On Oct 11 2017, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 11:48 -0300, rbr...@ime.usp.br wrote:
> > I am using an armel system with only 128MB of RAM (a KuroBox Pro) running
> > Debian testing and, if my memory serves me well, I started seeing lots and
> > lots of messages like:
> >
On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 11:48 -0300, rbr...@ime.usp.br wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 4.12.13-1
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Hi.
>
> I am using an armel system with only 128MB of RAM (a KuroBox Pro) running
> Debian testing and, if my memory serves me well, I started seeing lots and
> lots of
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.12.13-1
Severity: normal
Hi.
I am using an armel system with only 128MB of RAM (a KuroBox Pro) running
Debian testing and, if my memory serves me well, I started seeing lots and
lots of messages like:
mv643xx_eth_port mv643xx_eth_port.0 eth0: failed to
5 matches
Mail list logo