Bug#878249: recent OVS upload (was: Re: Bug#878249: Please package >= 2.7.0)

2017-10-27 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 03:45:48PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > I see a number of failed builds here: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=openvswitch=experimental > > Let me analyze them: > > * mips, powerpc, and ppc64 should be fixed by this commit that is > already on branch-2.8: >

Bug#878249: recent OVS upload (was: Re: Bug#878249: Please package >= 2.7.0)

2017-10-26 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 08:56:24PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I don't mind becoming a co-maintainer, though there's a few things that > need to change to facilitate packaging. First of all, I'd like to switch > to a Git packaging workflow, using git-buildpackage. The debian folder > upstream

Bug#878249: Please package >= 2.7.0

2017-10-20 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi Ben, I don't mind becoming a co-maintainer, though there's a few things that need to change to facilitate packaging. First of all, I'd like to switch to a Git packaging workflow, using git-buildpackage. The debian folder upstream here should be removed:

Bug#878249: Please package >= 2.7.0

2017-10-11 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 06:31:17PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi Ben (and others?), > > OpenStack Pike needs ovs >= 2.7.0. We're about to release it to Debian > unstable, > as it is currently staging in Experimental. Please package this ASAP. I'm currently seeking a new maintainer or

Bug#878249: Please package >= 2.7.0

2017-10-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: python-openvswitch Severity: wishlist Hi Ben (and others?), OpenStack Pike needs ovs >= 2.7.0. We're about to release it to Debian unstable, as it is currently staging in Experimental. Please package this ASAP. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)