Bug#880245: statsmodels

2019-02-13 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Sorry for being allow to respond... Please do what you need to do On February 13, 2019 5:47:41 PM EST, "Rebecca N. Palmer" wrote: >On 13/02/2019 09:10, Andreas Tille wrote: >> Any volunteer to backport the relevant changes I pushed to Git right >now >> to 0.8.0? > >I intend to try tomorrow, if

Bug#880245: statsmodels

2019-02-13 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 13/02/2019 09:10, Andreas Tille wrote: Any volunteer to backport the relevant changes I pushed to Git right now to 0.8.0? I intend to try tomorrow, if the uploaders don't say anything first. I'm actually wondering why the package did not got any removal from testing warning (or did I

Bug#880245: statsmodels

2019-02-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Rebecca, On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 08:01:27AM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > Is the subject line a leftover, or are you actually proposing to move 0.9.0 > from experimental to unstable (which is not generally allowed in soft > freeze)? Yes, that's a leftover. I just uploaded to

Bug#880245: statsmodels

2019-02-13 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Is the subject line a leftover, or are you actually proposing to move 0.9.0 from experimental to unstable (which is not generally allowed in soft freeze)? The upstream fix for #880245 (the original reason given for wanting the new version) is supposedly

Bug#880245: statsmodels: FTBFS: RuntimeError: Kernel died before replying to kernel_info

2017-10-30 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: statsmodels Version: 0.8.0-6 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20171030 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[2]: