Bug#881054: libarrayfire-opencl3: "INTERNAL KERNEL BUILD ERROR" from af::matmulTN

2018-05-07 Thread Ralf Stubner
On 20.11.2017 15:24, Ralf Stubner wrote: > I have given this some more thought and I am now quite sure that this is > indeed an issue in clBLAS, hence the reassign. I have also reported this upstream [1], but got no response from the maintainers. However, I was told by @tmagomedov that the

Bug#881054: libarrayfire-opencl3: "INTERNAL KERNEL BUILD ERROR" from af::matmulTN

2017-11-20 Thread Ralf Stubner
reassign 881054 libclblas2 thanks On 08.11.2017 17:31, Ralf Stubner wrote: > I have found another similar bug report: > https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clBLAS/issues/20 > > Following the suggestions there I have now build a custom version of > libclblas2 with the patch: [...]> With this

Bug#881054: libarrayfire-opencl3: "INTERNAL KERNEL BUILD ERROR" from af::matmulTN

2017-11-08 Thread Ralf Stubner
On 08.11.2017 15:38, Ralf Stubner wrote: > However, I have just found a very similar issue > where clBLAS is named as the source of the error: > https://github.com/Theano/libgpuarray/issues/216#issuecomment-232225071 I have found another similar bug report:

Bug#881054: libarrayfire-opencl3: "INTERNAL KERNEL BUILD ERROR" from af::matmulTN

2017-11-08 Thread Ralf Stubner
Hi Ghis, On 08.11.2017 14:08, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Based on the content of your report, you are suggesting that the latest > version (3.5.1 at this very time) would solve the issue you are > experiencing, am I correct? That is difficult to tell. Upstream's binary distribution has not shown

Bug#881054: libarrayfire-opencl3: "INTERNAL KERNEL BUILD ERROR" from af::matmulTN

2017-11-08 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Hi Ralf, Based on the content of your report, you are suggesting that the latest version (3.5.1 at this very time) would solve the issue you are experiencing, am I correct? Cheers, Ghis

Bug#881054: libarrayfire-opencl3: "INTERNAL KERNEL BUILD ERROR" from af::matmulTN

2017-11-07 Thread Ralf Stubner
Package: libarrayfire-opencl3 Version: 3.3.2+dfsg1-4 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? As a trivial example, I am trying to implement an OLS solver based on arrayfire. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)?