Bug#881146: [RFC 0/1] debian 9 update for multistrap

2018-05-30 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi Stefan, Quoting Stefan Müller-Klieser (2018-01-22 14:28:48) > I could not find a responsible mailinglist in the docs. Sorry if you are the > wrong persons to address the patch to. It would be nice to have kind like > this dev option for multistrap. Is this acceptable? Should this be done in a

Bug#881146: [RFC 0/1] debian 9 update for multistrap

2018-05-30 Thread Stefan Müller-Klieser
Hi, I could not find a responsible mailinglist in the docs. Sorry if you are the wrong persons to address the patch to. It would be nice to have kind like this dev option for multistrap. Is this acceptable? Should this be done in a different way? Some fine tuning? Thanks for your time! Stefan

Bug#881146: [RFC 1/1] multistrap: add development option insecure to conf file

2018-05-30 Thread Stefan Müller-Klieser
Since apt 1.5 it is not enough to have the noauth option for dev repositories. The content of the release file will also be checked before apt starts it work. To be able to use a repo without signing infrastructure for development we need an additional option allow-insecure=yes which can be set

Bug#881146:

2018-03-18 Thread Alistair Buxton
I am also affected by this bug. Since multistrap can only use keys it downloads from the host system's repositories this effectively makes it impossible to use with anything other than official Debian or Ubuntu repositories. -- Alistair Buxton a.j.bux...@gmail.com

Bug#881146: [multistrap] apt 1.5~alpha1 breaks initial multstrap repository updates

2017-11-08 Thread Andre Naujoks
Package: multistrap Version: 2.2.9 Severity: important --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Hi. Since (I assume) apt 1.5~alpha1 the following change is in apt (from apts changelog): * fail instead of warn on insecure repositories in apt-get This makes multistraps initial package