On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:48:53AM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
CCing people who showed interest on the bug report. Help with
(additional) testing would be welcome.
I've performed a preliminary test here: applied and build both
packages, patches apply clean, builds are fine; installed both
Control: tag -1 + patch
Hi,
Please see attached patches for both neomutt and mutt to implement
this. Review welcome. If you lack time, I'm happy to help out with
a NMU. If so please just say, so we can skip the waiting.
Note for mutt: I did not revert the previous commit[1] that ripped out
alter
Package: neomutt
Version: 20171027+dfsg.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #882715
I'd like this as well, not just for command-line muscle memory but for
scripts built around mutt.
- Josh Triplett
Package: neomutt
Version: 20171027-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
You made us used to all the goodness in neomutt in stretch, making the
vanilla mutt vs neomutt choice obvious. Yet, it breaks muscle memory:
[~]$ mutt
-bash: mutt: command not found
Obviously, one can make aliases, but that's tedious t
4 matches
Mail list logo
