On Tue, 05 Dec 2017 at 12:26:43 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> More importantly, several packages now require just systemd-sysv. If
> apt is told to install libpam-systemd and such a package in the same
> operation (especially in a chroot I'd say, since that's where neither
> shim nor sysv is
s ("Re: Bug#883573: Reevaluate libpam-systemd
> > systemd-sysv dependency ordering (746578)"):
> > > I think another major problem (with bug 883555) though is that
> > > systemd-shim
> > > is not Multi-Arch: foreign like systemd-sysv. In that
Control: reassign 883555 systemd-shim
Control: retitle 883555 systemd-shim should be Multi-Arch: foreign
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 06:19:28PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Julian Andres Klode writes ("Re: Bug#883573: Reevaluate libpam-systemd
> systemd-sysv dependency ordering (74657
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 06:48:45PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> gpsd
netbase | systemd-sysv
> mandos
systemd-sysv | lsb-base (>= 3.0-6)
> micro-httpd
openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver | micro-inetd | netcat-traditional |
systemd-sysv
> munin
cron | cron-daemon | systemd-sysv
--
WBR,
Julian Andres Klode writes ("Re: Bug#883573: Reevaluate libpam-systemd
systemd-sysv dependency ordering (746578)"):
> I think another major problem (with bug 883555) though is that systemd-shim
> is not Multi-Arch: foreign like systemd-sysv. In that case, systemd-shim wa
On Tue, 05 Dec 2017, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 05:36:10PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > One question I have is about this: "several packages now require just
> > systemd-sysv". Can someone refer to some examples, please ?
>
> $ grep-aptavail -FDepends systemd-sysv
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 05:36:10PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> One question I have is about this: "several packages now require just
> systemd-sysv". Can someone refer to some examples, please ?
Third random try from `reverse-depends systemd-sysv` yielded lava-server.
--
WBR, wRAR
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 05:36:10PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Don Armstrong writes ("Bug#883573: Reevaluate libpam-systemd systemd-sysv
> dependency ordering (746578)"):
> > On Tue, 05 Dec 2017, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > > I thus opened bug 883569 against
Don Armstrong writes ("Bug#883573: Reevaluate libpam-systemd systemd-sysv
dependency ordering (746578)"):
> On Tue, 05 Dec 2017, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > I thus opened bug 883569 against systemd, but mbiebl would like to
> > get permission from the you first.
I t
On Tue, 05 Dec 2017, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> More importantly, several packages now require just systemd-sysv. If
> apt is told to install libpam-systemd and such a package in the same
> operation (especially in a chroot I'd say, since that's where neither
> shim nor sysv is installed), it
Hi Julian,
Le mardi, 5 décembre 2017, 12.26:43 h CET Julian Andres Klode a écrit :
> In 746578, the CTTE decided that the dependency be swapped
> to systemd-shim | systemd-sysv in order to prevent systems
> from being upgraded installing systemd.
>
> (…)
>
> I thus opened bug 883569 against
Package: tech-ctte
Severity: normal
Control: block 883569 by -1
Dear CTTE,
In 746578, the CTTE decided that the dependency be swapped
to systemd-shim | systemd-sysv in order to prevent systems
from being upgraded installing systemd.
This argument should be moot now. Either dependency is
12 matches
Mail list logo
