> Oh dear:
> Need to get 336 MB/343 MB of archives.
> After this operation, 960 MB of additional disk space will be used.
I know. The problem is old and known, namely that many TeX documents
search fonts not via fontconfig but via file name, and thus the fonts
have to be in the texmf tree (at lea
On 2017-12-13 Norbert Preining wrote:
> reassign 884230 enblend-enfuse
> retitle 884230 needs updated build-deps (add texlive-fonts-extra)
> thanks
> > The root problem is that in 2017.20171128-1 cmbcsc10 moved
> > from texlive-base to texlive-fonts-extra, that should be
> > moved back to texlive
reassign 884230 enblend-enfuse
retitle 884230 needs updated build-deps (add texlive-fonts-extra)
thanks
> The root problem is that in 2017.20171128-1 cmbcsc10 moved
> from texlive-base to texlive-fonts-extra, that should be
> moved back to texlive-base.
Why? Just update the build-deps.
Upstream h
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2017.20171128-1
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 src:enblend-enfuse
enblend-enfuse started to FTBFS with 2017.20171128-1:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/enblend-enfuse.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64
4 matches
Mail list logo