Bug#887258: palo should depend on e2fsprogs explicitly

2018-02-23 Thread Helmut Grohne
Control: severity -1 minor On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 04:47:03PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote: > On 15.01.2018 16:50, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > Personally I'd probably make e2fsprogs a Recommends if I hade to make > > the decision > > Thanks for this suggestion, which I followed: >

Bug#887258: palo should depend on e2fsprogs explicitly

2018-01-17 Thread Helge Deller
Hi Andreas, On 15.01.2018 16:50, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Personally I'd probably make e2fsprogs a Recommends if I hade to make > the decision Thanks for this suggestion, which I followed:

Bug#887258: palo should depend on e2fsprogs explicitly

2018-01-15 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello, I looked into palo and it seems it only optionally invokes the e2fsprogs related bits if ran with -e // --format-as option specified. Personally I'd probably make e2fsprogs a Recommends if I hade to make the decision, but it's kind of splitting hairs here between Recommends and Suggests

Bug#887258: palo should depend on e2fsprogs explicitly

2018-01-15 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Helge, On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 08:44:19AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote: > palo debian control file currently states: > Suggests: e2fsprogs (>= 1.2) > > Isn't that sufficient? I'm sorry. I was not considering that Suggests could be used as well. If this is sufficient for your purpose, then so