Hi, On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 12:33:16PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > They might have just reverted the patch in glib2. Which then according to the > commit log of glib causes issues in other things. > > Cloning the bug to glib but I am not sure whether it's even worthwhile > to "fix" (revert the patch), as 6.0 where this behaviour in LO is fixed is > only ~ 2 weeks away. > FWIW:
10:06 < _rene_> caolan: https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/libreoffice.git/commit/?h=f27&id=ea905ac13095db37edd90d577c0cfc9759a6f718. which "fix in glib"? 10:06 * _rene_ has that "fun" too in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887404 10:07 <@caolan> _rene_, https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/glib2.git/commit/?id=087ef3ba0f761075383df46eae90e76cf7e3fea4 10:08 -!- scarabeus [~quassel@opensuse/member/scarabeus] has joined #libreoffice-dev 10:08 < _rene_> ok, will give that to our glib people. thankfully we don't have that in a stable release so I can just upload 6.0 and it also will work at least for LO :) 10:08 < _rene_> thanks Regards, Rene
