Bug#887716: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#887716: not necessarily not running

After reading your initial bug report again, it seems you have started nftables not using the nftables.service i.e. nftables.service is indeed not running. I thus think the message from deb-systemd-invoke is correct. The only bit that could be maybe be tweaked is: > } elsif

Bug#887716: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#887716: not necessarily not running

Am 24.01.2018 um 02:50 schrieb Michael Biebl: > Control: reassign -1 init-system-helpers > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo unreproducible > > > Am 23.01.2018 um 23:57 schrieb Michael Biebl: >> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible >> >> [please always CC the maintainer if you reassign a bug

Bug#887716: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#887716: not necessarily not running

Control: reassign -1 init-system-helpers Control: tags -1 - moreinfo unreproducible Am 23.01.2018 um 23:57 schrieb Michael Biebl: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible > > [please always CC the maintainer if you reassign a bug report] > > On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:31:06 +0100 Arturo

Bug#887716: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#887716: not necessarily not running

MB> How exactly did you disable the service? If I install the nftables MB> package I get no such message. All I know is on my machines I have it disabled, I think by some '$ systemctrl disable' command I used years ago. And I only start and stop it via my modem controller script (no point in

Bug#887716: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#887716: not necessarily not running

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible [please always CC the maintainer if you reassign a bug report] On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:31:06 +0100 Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 21:58:11 +0800 =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan > Jacobson

Bug#887716: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#887716: not necessarily not running

On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 21:58:11 +0800 =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson wrote: > I'm just saying > > nftables.service is a disabled or a static unit not running, not starting > > it. > perhaps could be better written > > nftables.service is disabled. Not starting it. > or >

Bug#887716: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#887716: not necessarily not running

I'm just saying > nftables.service is a disabled or a static unit not running, not starting it. perhaps could be better written > nftables.service is disabled. Not starting it. or > nftables.service is not enabled, so not starting it. or > nftables.service is not enabled, so not starting it. > If

Bug#887716: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#887716: not necessarily not running

On 19 January 2018 at 11:46, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > Package: nftables > Version: 0.8.1-1 > Severity: minor > > Setting up nftables (0.8.1-1) ... > nftables.service is a disabled or a static unit not running, not starting it. > > Not completely correct. Yes it is disabled,