On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 15:28 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 6:23 PM Adam D. Barratt <
> a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> >
> > On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 15:21 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > > I started maintaining OpenVSwitch long after
On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 15:28 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Both `service` and `invoke-rc.d` wrappers have a few safeguards
> against running in unwanted contexts. Have you tried using one of
> them?
>
For avoidance of any possible doubt, "you" here is Thomas, not me.
Regards,
Adam
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 6:23 PM Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 15:21 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > I started maintaining OpenVSwitch long after the Stretch release, and
> > discovered #858418, which is very annoying for OpenVSwitch users.
> >
>
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 15:21 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I started maintaining OpenVSwitch long after the Stretch release, and
> discovered #858418, which is very annoying for OpenVSwitch users.
>
> tl;dr: #858418 prevent anyone that has a valid
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear release team,
I started maintaining OpenVSwitch long after the Stretch release, and
discovered #858418, which is very annoying for OpenVSwitch users.
tl;dr: #858418 prevent
5 matches
Mail list logo
