Bug#888949: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: recognize X{S,B}-Ruby-Versions field for packages depending on ruby, not only ruby section

On Wednesday, 4 April 2018 22:20:08 CEST Cédric Boutillier wrote: > So I think "build-depend on gem2deb" would be > the best criterion. > > Now a decision based on the Maintainer field would possibly cover more > than 95% of the cases already, with (almost?) no false positive. Well, the fact

Bug#888949: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: recognize X{S,B}-Ruby-Versions field for packages depending on ruby, not only ruby section

Sure, thanks!

Bug#888949: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: recognize X{S,B}-Ruby-Versions field for packages depending on ruby, not only ruby section

> How about basing this decision on the Maintainer field ? (which would > probably > be more reliable than basing the decision on the presence of a dependency) The XS-Ruby-Version is used (only?) by dh_ruby provided by the gem2deb package. I think this behaviour would be useful also for

Bug#888949: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: recognize X{S,B}-Ruby-Versions field for packages depending on ruby, not only ruby section

On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 15:01:33 +0100 =?utf-8?Q?C=C3=A9dric?= Boutillier wrote: > The spectrum of ruby packages in Debian became wider some of the > packages, though they use gem2deb and make use of these variables, are > not in the ruby section of the archive. Such an example is

Bug#888949: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: recognize X{S,B}-Ruby-Versions field for packages depending on ruby, not only ruby section

Package: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl Version: 2.105 Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, For a few years now, cme recognizes the X{S,B}-Ruby-Versions fields in debian/control for packages of the ruby section. Thanks a lot for that. The spectrum of ruby packages in Debian became wider some of the