Bug#891005: RFS: gdbm/1.14.1-5

[2018-02-28 10:21] Ansgar Burchardt > Gianfranco Costamagna writes: > > I think there is nothing to worry about :) > > > > this is the path: > > /usr/lib/*/diet/*/libgdbm.a > > It is a problem as the package might provide different functionality > when someone else builds and

Bug#891005: RFS: gdbm/1.14.1-5

Gianfranco Costamagna writes: >>This means building the package will give different results depending >>on dietlibc-dev installed or not? That shouldn't happen... >> >>Please check via some other means that a build using dietlibc has been >>requested; don't do different things just because a

Bug#891005: RFS: gdbm/1.14.1-5

Hello Ansgar >This means building the package will give different results depending >on dietlibc-dev installed or not? That shouldn't happen... > >Please check via some other means that a build using dietlibc has been >requested; don't do different things just because a package happens to >be

Bug#891005: RFS: gdbm/1.14.1-5

On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 13:58 +0300, kact...@gnu.org wrote: > Anyhow, if you want to enable, you can do something like this, to > make > > me and you happy, and then easily revert when new bugs are opened > > > HAVE_DIETLIBC=no > ifeq ($(shell dpkg -s dietlibc-dev | grep -o

Bug#891005: RFS: gdbm/1.14.1-5

Hello. > Anyhow, if you want to enable, you can do something like this, to make > me and you happy, and then easily revert when new bugs are opened HAVE_DIETLIBC=no ifeq ($(shell dpkg -s dietlibc-dev | grep -o installed), installed) DIET_LIBDIR := $(shell diet

Bug#891005: RFS: gdbm/1.14.1-5

Hello >With all my respect, I am very relucant to solve problems of Ubuntu at >expense of Debian output. What exactly is wrong, Debian-wise, in package >we are discussing, apart the need to specify long list of architectures, >so I could fix it? this is not an "Ubuntu" problem, but something

Bug#891005: RFS: gdbm/1.14.1-5

[2018-02-21 17:02] Gianfranco Costamagna > >!Important! This upload re-enables diet libc support {conditional, via > >build profiles}. Input from developers, experienced with Debian > >bootstrap is very, very welcome. > > Since this is causing troubles in Ubuntu

Bug#891005: RFS: gdbm/1.14.1-5

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hello! >!Important! This upload re-enables diet libc support {conditional, via >build profiles}. Input from developers, experienced with Debian >bootstrap is very, very welcome. Since this is causing troubles in Ubuntu (Matthias, please give your

Bug#891005: RFS: gdbm/1.14.1-5

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist !Important! This upload re-enables diet libc support {conditional, via build profiles}. Input from developers, experienced with Debian bootstrap is very, very welcome. Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gdbm" * Package