Andreas Beckmann writes:
> Probably not worth visiting this in detail before I switch
> to llvm-5.0 with pocl-1.1 soon.
OK, thanks!
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu
Control: block -1 with 891690
On 2018-03-09 03:51, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Builds of pocl for most non-x86 architectures, including several
> release architectures, failed with heavy test suite errors: between
> 12% and 16% of tests passed, depending on the architecture [1]. The
> only exceptions
2 matches
Mail list logo
