Bug#895450: slapd: segfault in back_mdb

2019-12-20 Thread wferi
Ryan Tandy writes: > With your coredump, could you dig a little further into the two > "sml_mod" structures and show their sm_desc/sm_values/sm_nvalues? Sure: (gdb) p *modlist->sml_mod.sm_desc $8 = {ad_next = 0x0, ad_type = 0x5652a198da20, ad_cname = {bv_len = 3, bv_val = 0x5652a198d900

Bug#895450: slapd: segfault in back_mdb

2019-12-19 Thread Ryan Tandy
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 06:12:05PM +0100, wf...@niif.hu wrote: One and a half year later, and I've got a core dump! Yay! I guess the problem here is the "sml_next" value. I have not reproduced the crash yet, but for a start I am looking at "m2" on syncrepl.c:3236. With your coredump, could

Bug#895450: slapd: segfault in back_mdb

2019-12-19 Thread wferi
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 10:08:25 -0700 Ryan Tandy wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 06:41:08PM +0200, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > >> slapd[4515]: segfault at 4c ip 7f71abdbfc9b sp 7f716f184780 error 4 >> in back_mdb-2.4.so.2.10.7[7f71abdb+39000] > > Not familiar

Bug#895450: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#895450: slapd: segfault in back_mdb

2018-04-11 Thread Ryan Tandy
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hello Ferenc, On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 06:41:08PM +0200, Ferenc Wágner wrote: Does this ring any bells? This crash does not happen frequently, so I decided to report this little info now, but I'll add more as I got any. Not familiar to me, nor to upstream based on

Bug#895450: slapd: segfault in back_mdb

2018-04-11 Thread Ferenc Wágner
Package: slapd Version: 2.4.44+dfsg-5+deb9u1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, A partial replica slave crashed with Apr 3 14:53:51 birch kernel: [1906479.552078] slapd[4515]: segfault at 4c ip 7f71abdbfc9b sp 7f716f184780 error 4 in back_mdb-2.4.so.2.10.7[7f71abdb+39000]